Senate members are polarized in the Congress. Republicans and Democrats always have differences in the greatest social and economic policies, holding their specific and strongly decided sides. I question party polarization in Congress as the main cause of why the citizens hate Congress. Political analysts too point out party polarization as the greatest cause for all kinds of congressional instability. I argue that varying opinions on the duties and jurisdiction of congress are not the cause of current unhealthy partisanship, but it is majorly influenced by close competition for power.
The two major political parties have become more ideologically consistent on the basis of social and economic concerns (Lee, 2009). Competition is key for democracy in every nation, taking into consideration that powers to dictate a nation are not given to any leader or party. Contesting and open reproval are needed for us to make excellent findings. Currently, none of the parties are able to confidently win support from a good number of citizens to get a complete control on the nation, and I argue that finding a known outcomes of these scenarios will not be easy. Nevertheless, intraparty and interparty competition adds up to making politicians on the watch out, unquestioned competition encourages politicians to challenge the best platforms and to weigh competition inline with a socially leveled case. Most of them view their own ideology as not aligning with their expressed political custom.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The two parties currently have major incentives to dramatize their clear differences. (Lee, 2020) For them to excite their voters, the parties use apocalyptic rhetoric. The opponent is criticized more in competitive races contumaciously more mudslinging and charge and counter-charge. Generally, competitive debates are full of nasty events. Considering every competitive circumstance, the parties exaggerate the partisan stakes in a manner that their voters are frightened. Under such circumstances, the parties use fear as a mobilizer. Parties have been observed using every tool that they have to try to win when they find themselves locked in an intense power struggle. This is the politics of the “outs” against the “ins,” where the out-party majors lack trust with the in-party on each and every topic. The topics are not to be supported by the out-party. Since they are inclined on partisanship, they often object reductions in government budgeting for projects to be implemented. Nevertheless, they oppose the government’s budget deficits. The out-party does not allow for a supportive scenario that could work. They object increases of borrowing finance by the government, taking into consideration that a failure to increase levels of borrowing finance will probably lead to an extreme disastrous consequence for the economy. The out-party is not bound to look into concerns on reconciling competing goods and dealing with limited resources. The in-party are bound to look into every concern and make hard choices. The in-party in all circumstances are criticized by the objecting party. Clearly, one can see that being out of power hands you freedom. All in all, we might not be as divided as we seem (Lee, 2016).
The members have become sorted generously by party (Callen and Rocco, 2020) . For example, Democrats always have been supportive of social safety than Republicans. Conflict on opinion from the parties has significantly been on the rise over the past two decades. It is observed that 66% of Republicans believe that poor people currently aren’t suffering since they have access to utilities distributed by the government even though they don’t work for it, and about 25% are in opinion that people living in poverty find it hard since the government utilities are not enough to help them have a decent life. Among Democrats, 28% are in belief that people living in poverty have no hardships. The political parties’ difference concerning this variable is currently 38 percent. Ever since, Party conflicts have increased since the parties have a common goal of monitoring their voters more internally, with the majority members party winning the competition strongly and the minority losing the competition by a big margin. All the stakes that both parties have rooted in the congress filter down to Democratic supporters viewing Republican supporters very negatively and Republican voters seeing Democratic voters more negatively (Janda et al., 2017).
Parties in congress exercise little to no influence on legislators’ decisions; that it is the individual member but not the party who is the main actor in congressional politics. Both parties compete for policy outcomes and power. More attention is needed on investment by political parties for power in Congress and how partisan conflict can be created separately from the ideologies that polarize liberals from conservatives. Party politics often centers on Congress rather than cases of competence and corruption. The citizens have not come to the extent of polarization as political representatives, but they supported the suggested opinions from polarized leaders.
References
Lee, F. (2009). Beyond Ideology; Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S Senate. The University of Chicago Press, LTD., 10-216
Callen, Z. Rocco, P. (2020). American Political Development and Trump Presidency. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. 150-280
Lee, F. (2016). Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. University of Chicago Press, LTD., 130-294
Janda, K. Berry, J. Goldman, J. Deborah, D. Manna, P. (2017). The Challenge of Democracy. Cengage Learning. 342- 361
