27 Sep 2022

82

How to Calculate and Interpret the Current Ratio

Format: APA

Academic level: Master’s

Paper type: Research Paper

Words: 546

Pages: 2

Downloads: 0

Current ratio records the capacity of a company to meet its short-term commitments. A current ratio that is high is an indicator that a company is in a better situation to meet its short-term obligations. The current ratios deemed satisfactory vary from one industry to another with the acceptable range usually falling between 1 and 3 ( gurufocus, 2017). A current ratio that is below 1 is an indicator that a company might have difficulties in paying its obligations. Dividing a company’s total current assets by the total current liabilities gives the current ratio value (gurufocus, 2017). A current ratio that is lower than 1 implies that a company’s financial health is not at its best status. However, it does not mean that the company is on the brink of going bankrupt (gurufocus, 2017). A current ratio that is too high, on the other hand, is an indicator that “a company is not making efficient use of its current assets or short term financing” options (ycharts, 2017). 

For Ford, the current ratio as of December 2016 was 1.20. This is an indicator that the company’s short-term financial strength was fairly strong. Analyzed over the last 13 years, the company’s median current ratio is 1.71(gurufocus, 2017). On the other hand, the company’s lowest current ratio over the same period was 0.83 while the highest was 4.32. The industry’s median current stands at 1.56, meaning that Ford’s ratio is slightly lower than the industry’s average. Compared to 1111 global automobile manufacturers, the company’s ratio is lower than 70% of these companies (gurufocus, 2017). 

It’s time to jumpstart your paper!

Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.

Get custom essay

Fig1: Ford Motor Current Ratio (Quarterly) Chart 

As of December 2016, Chrysler’s current ratio was 0.80. Being below the standard acceptable value of 1, this current ratio value is an indicator that the company might find it difficult to meet its current obligations (gurufocus, 2017). When historical data for the past 13 years is taken into consideration, the company’s median current ratio value is 1.40. The highest current ratio recorded by the company was 2.2 while the lowest was 0.8. Compared to the industry median of 1.56, Chrysler’s current ratio is significantly lower, a fact that places it below 92% of the 1111 players in the global automobile industry. Despite the lower current ratio value being an indicator of the company’s inability to meet its short-term obligations, it does not imply that there is a critical problem (gurufocus, 2017). With good long-term prospects, Chrysler might still be in a position to borrow from lenders in a bid to cover their short-term obligations. Compared to Ford, Chrysler’s Current ratio is lower. This means that the company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations is slightly lower than that of Ford (gurufocus, 2017). 

Fig 2: Chrysler’s Current Ratio (Quarterly) Chart 

For Toyota Motor Corp, the company’s current ratio as of the end of the last quarter in December 31 st was 1.01. Being slightly above 1, this current ratio value is an indicator that the company’s short-term financial strength is fairly good (gurufocus, 2017). Taking the last 13 years into consideration, Toyota’s median current was 1.09 while the lowest recorded value of the current ratio was 0.98. On the other hand, the highest recorded current ratio for the company in the last 13 years was 1.51 (gurufocus, 2017). Taking into consideration 1111 other global motor companies, Toyota’s current ratio is below 81% of the said players. Its current ratio of 1.01 is slightly lower than the industry’s average of 1.56. Compared to Chrysler’ and Ford’s current ratio, Toyota’s current ratio was slightly above Chrysler’s but slightly lower than Ford’s (gurufocus, 2017). This implies that among the three company’s Ford is the best position to pay its short-term obligations followed by Toyota and then Chrysler. However, all the three players’ current ratio as of December 31 st were lower than the industry’s average. 

Fig 3: Toyota’s Current Ratio (Quarterly) Chart 

References 

gurufocus,. (2017). Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (NYSE:FCAU) Current Ratio . Gurufocus.com . Retrieved from http://www.gurufocus.com/term/current_ratio/NYSE:FCAU/Current-Ratio/Fiat-Chrysler-Automobiles-NV 

gurufocus,. (2017). Ford Motor Co (F) Current Ratio . Gurufocus.com . Retrieved from http://www.gurufocus.com/term/current_ratio/F/Current-Ratio/Ford-Motor-Co 

gurufocus,. (2017). Toyota Motor Corp (NYSE:TM) Current Ratio . Gurufocus.com . Retrieved from http://www.gurufocus.com/term/current_ratio/NYSE:TM/Current-Ratio/Toyota-Motor-Corp 

ycharts (2017). Ford Motor Current Ratio (Quarterly) (F) . Ycharts.com . Retrieved from https://ycharts.com/companies/F/current_ratio 

Illustration
Cite this page

Select style:

Reference

StudyBounty. (2023, September 14). How to Calculate and Interpret the Current Ratio.
https://studybounty.com/2-how-to-calculate-and-interpret-the-current-ratio-research-paper

illustration

Related essays

We post free essay examples for college on a regular basis. Stay in the know!

Texas Roadhouse: The Best Steakhouse in Town

Running Head: TEXAS ROADHOUSE 1 Texas Roadhouse Prospective analysis is often used to determine specific challenges within systems used in operating different organizations. Thereafter, the leadership of that...

Words: 282

Pages: 1

Views: 94

The Benefits of an Accounting Analysis Strategy

Running head: AT & T FINANCE ANALLYSIS 1 AT & T Financial Analysis Accounting Analysis strategy and Disclosure Quality Accounting strategy is brought about by management flexibility where they can use...

Words: 1458

Pages: 6

Views: 82

Employee Benefits: Fringe Benefits

_De Minimis Fringe Benefits _ _Why are De Minimis Fringe Benefits excluded under Internal Revenue Code section 132(a)(4)? _ De minimis fringe benefits are excluded under Internal Revenue Code section 132(a)(4)...

Words: 1748

Pages: 8

Views: 197

Standard Costs and Variance Analysis

As the business firms embark on production, the stakeholders have to plan the cost of offering the services sufficiently. Therefore, firms have to come up with a standard cost and cumulatively a budget, which they...

Words: 1103

Pages: 4

Views: 180

The Best Boat Marinas in the United Kingdom

I. Analyzing Information Needs The types of information that Molly Mackenzie Boat Marina requires in its business operations and decision making include basic customer information, information about the rates,...

Words: 627

Pages: 4

Views: 98

Spies v. United States: The Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Espionage

This is a case which dealt with the issue of income tax evasion. The case determined that for income tax evasion to be found to have transpired, one must willfully disregard their duty to pay tax and engage in ways...

Words: 277

Pages: 1

Views: 121

illustration

Running out of time?

Entrust your assignment to proficient writers and receive TOP-quality paper before the deadline is over.

Illustration