The French and the Belgian governments were the first to ban women from wearing the burqa and the niqab. Notably, the call for western nations to also follow suit ended up receiving various assertions and reactions from the public. According to feministic arguments, such actions degrade women’s position in the society. Indeed, women have a right to choose what they want as human beings without being exposed to judgmental and skeptical views of right or wrong. However, Phyllis Chesler’s article focuses on promoting the idea of banning the wearing of Burqa and Niqab, and she presents different reasons for her stand.
Against Wearing Burqa and Niqab
According to the arguments by Chesler, wearing burqa and niqab are practices that have been in existence for far too long, but they do not present any relationship with the Islamic religion. Instead, forcing women to wear the veils is a social construct, instituted by men to ensure the movement of women gets curtailed. Although the world is changing, the feministic influence in the Arab world is minimal, resulting in women still getting bullied by actions of a patriarchal setting. Ironically, while mother countries are putting measures in place to advance the women’s role in the society, the same women in foreign nations stick to traditions that only serve to oppress. The failure of feministic advocates to identify the issue and lobby against its practice also presents a satirical state in that while they recognize and fight for, “my dress my choice,” the same is not done for the burqa and niqab. The assertions by Phyllis ring true in the sense that even though both the niqab and the burqa are meant to hide one’s shame, no one is guilty unless proven so.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Relationship between Covering One’s Face in Public and Security
Identity comes down to facial exposition and body views hence without one seeing what another looks like, it becomes impossible to discern whether they are male or female. Most crimes happen as a result of terror groups hiding behind the niqab and burqa before slipping through checkpoints. Additionally, having a burqa and niqab on prevents other people from seeing what the wearer is carrying, which serves as a perfect cover for the suicide bombers. Transparency and visibility ensure people are aware of who is in their surroundings and what they are carrying. As such, the burqa and niqab are a threat that, if left unchecked could result in devastating horrors.
Conclusion
By providing a historical context in addition to an analysis of different elements that encompass the Muslim world, Chesler’s arguments point to the facts on why implementing the ban on the niqab and burqa would be beneficial to the world. Women will, therefore, get a chance to be free, and the world would be a safer place due to the absence of invisible weapons or devices. As such, the paper is a call to feministic advocates to recognize existing advantages of implementing the ban of burqa and niqab.
Reference
Chesler, P. (2010). ‘Ban the Burqa? The argument in favor.’ Middle East Quarterly , 17 (4), 33-45.
