In this situation, Officer James and Sergeant Drummond had a reasonable cause to be engaged in the initial surveillance at the credit union because they had received information from reliable sources. Mainly, the information about the possibility of a robbery attack at the credit union came to these officers through a communication from the patrol division upon being alerted by a detective who received an anonymous tip. However, the officers did not have a reasonable cause to question the Asian people in the area in the manner that they did because that amounted to unnecessary disturbance and invasion of people's privacy unduly (Vincent, 2013). Besides, it was not realistic and practical for the officers to look for the suspects by questioning anybody from the racial origin in that area.
The officers did not violate the civil rights of the African American Man because they were acting on information from a security officer who identified him as a possible suspect of a robbery that was expected to happen at the. Besides, the officers used a considerable amount of force in arresting the African American man only after he became very agitated upon seeing his wife and child in the ground (Hahn, Truman & Williams, 2018). By this time, the police officers had no choice but to subdue and arrest the man because they were considering his as a suspect of robbery who was possibly armed, the man was becoming increasingly agitated, and he was resisting arrest.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
To deal with the situation, the chief police may decide to subject the two police officers to some form or level of disciplinary actions owing to the actions in questioning and taking personal information from several Asian people around the credit union areas because it would be perceived as ethnic profiling against people belonging to the Asian race. Under the circumstances and occurrences that characterize this particular situation, the woman should not be entitled to college damages because the two police officers did not have any direct involvement in her tribulations (Hahn, Truman & Williams, 2018). Firstly, the police officers were not aware that African American man that they were trying to subdue was her husband. Secondly, officers were not aware of her epileptic conditions before ordering her to get back to her car. The damages experienced by the woman during this occurrence may have resulted from the attempt to arrest her husband, but the police could not be directly blamed because they were discharging the role and responsibility of policing and arresting a robbery suspect.
It the officers are to be charged for being guilty of engaging on ethnic profiling, it should be related to their decision and action in approaching various people of Asian origin and questioning them while demanding to their personal information with the belief that they knew something about the impending robbery at the credit union. Such actions amounted to racial profiling in the sense that it is incorrect to believe that only individuals belonging to the Asian race could have information or be involved in an impending robbery. Besides, it was unfair to try to suspect anybody from the Asian race before finally settling on an African American at the primary suspect (Vincent, 2013). Based on the assumption that this case culminated to a public outcry prompting a citizen review board charged with a responsibility of examining questionable activities by the police officers before recommending disciplinary and policy actions, I would not support its creation. I would stand by this position because the officers were right in discharging the duties and that they are always expected to be vigilant and act within the law which is what they did in this scenario.
References
Hahn, R. A., Truman, B. I., & Williams, D. R. (2018). Civil rights as determinants of public health and racial and ethnic health equity: Health care, education, employment, and housing in the United States. SSM - population health , 4 , 17-24.
Vincent, R. (2013). Human Rights and the United States Policy Toward Latin America and The International Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. International Affairs , 59 (2), 280-281. doi: 10.2307/2619976
