The proliferation of fake news in the 2016 election season is enough proof of the reality of fake news on social media platforms. The recent proliferation of fake news on Facebook is one such example. Since then, Mark Zuckerberg has had a cynical reaction to the allegation that fake news circulating on Facebook affected the US presidential election campaigns in 2016. At first, Mark Zuckerberg was hesitant to accept the responsibility of dealing with the problem of fake news in the world's largest social media platform. The ethical dilemma is dealing with fake news in the world's most potent news advertising network while ensuring that we do not become arbiters of truth ourselves.
Some of the recommendations to address this dilemma include a personal responsibility for everyone to combat the proliferation of fake news, supporting investigative journalism, cutting off financial incentives given to fake news propagators, and the ameliorating digital literacy among the public. Credibility and integrity of information are central to the propagation of democracy and harmony in society. The public has a significant role in the moderation of fake news on social platforms. However, using the public to control the spread of fake news on Facebook would not be the best approach.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
My recommended choice is to identify all the fake news sources and to ban them from advertising on all social media platforms. As well, all financing the media houses of fake news should be cut off. The identification of all fake news sources and cutting off their financial links is crucial in controlling the spread of fake news. This alternative will be more effective than all other alternatives because it has immediate outcomes. However, using the public to highlight and downplay fake news on Facebook may be ineffective because people tend to have a difference of opinion, interests, and bias.
