29 Jun 2022

314

Financial Returns and Capital Constraints- Pepsi-Co

Format: APA

Academic level: College

Paper type: Essay (Any Type)

Words: 1043

Pages: 3

Downloads: 0

Introduction 

Financial analysis involves appraisal of the performance of a business, project to establish suitability and financial performance. This paper aims to examine the financial performance of Pepsi-Co Inc. for the last three years based on ROE, dividends growth, and capital constraints. 

Return on Equity using the Dupont system 

Dupont analysis is an extended evaluation of the return on equity formula employed in assessing the various drivers of return on Equity (Gibson, 2020) . Companies use Dupont analysis in a bid to try and figure out ways to increase the return on Equity and ensure investors get value for the investment made in the company. Dupont analysis comprises of three ratios. Profit margin is used to assess a company's capability to generate positive returns in the form of profits. Equity multiplier analyses the levels of debt utilized in the company, while asset turnover determines the efficiency of management in the utilization of the company's assets to generate sales revenue. 

It’s time to jumpstart your paper!

Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.

Get custom essay

DuPont framework is given by; Profit margin * Equity multiplier * Asset turnover. 

DuPont analysis for Pepsi-Co: Figures in $ million: 

Profit margin; Net income / Net sales 

2019: = 7353 / 67161 = 0.11 

2018: = 12559/ 64661 = 0.19 

2017: = 4908 / 63525 = 0.077 

Equity Multiplier: Average total assets / average total equity 

2019: = 78098 / 14735 = 5.30 

2018: = 78726 / 12791.50 = 6.15 

2017: = 76647 / 11090 = 6.91 

Average total assets; 

2019: (78547 + 77648) / 2 = 78097.50 

2018: (79804+77648) / 2 = 78726 

2017: (73490+79804) / 2 = 76647 

Average total equity; 

2019: (14602 + 14868) / 2 = 14735 

2018: (10981 + 14602) / 2 = 12791.50 

2017: (11199+10981) / 2 = 11090 

Asset turnover: Net sales / Average total assets = 

2019: 67161/ 78098 = 0.86 

2018: 64661 / 78726 = 0.82 

2017: 63525 / 76647 = 0.83 

DuPont 2019 = 0.11 * 5.30 *0.86 = 0.501 

DuPont 2018 = 0.19*6.15*0.82 = 0.958 

DuPont 2017 = 0.077*6.91*0.83 = 0.442 

Source : ("Annual Reports and Proxy Information", 2020) 

The profit margin moves up in 2018 from 7.7 per cent to 19 per cent before falling again to 11 per cent in 2019 while the asset turnover decline first from 0.83 to 0.82 in 2018, further rising to 0.86 2019. Equity multiplier ratio has been dropping for the three years from a high of 6.91 to 5.30 in 2019. The trend in these ratios exhibit wave-like form with the drop in 2019 for the ROE is the rise in operating costs, additional debt financing that made profit margin and equity multiplier to drop. Asset turnover increased as a result of rise in sales revenue and drop in average assets as the company disposed some items of PPE in the year. 

The main competitor for PepsiCo Inc. is Coca-cola. Coca-Cola's Dupont analysis; 

  Profit Margin  Equity Multiplier  Asset Multiplier 

2019 

0.24 

4.22 

0.44 

2018 

0.19 

4.50 

0.40 

2017 

0.04 

4.15 

0.41 

Coca-Cola DuPont for three years; 

2019: 0.24*4.22*0.44 = 0.446 

2018: 0.19*4.50*0.40 = 0.342 

2017: 0.04*4.15*0.41 = 0.068 

The trend on profit margin is rising for Coca-Cola, unlike for Pepsi-Co, which dropped in 2019. Coca-Cola's equity multiplier has risen for the three years, unlike Pepsi-co, which has dropped, but both companies exhibit a similar trend on asset turnover, dropped, and then rose again in 2019. The major driver of ROE for both companies is the equity multiplier. Pepsi-Co has higher ROE for all three years. 

The industry average ROE for 2019 is 33.18 percent. Both Pepsi-Co and Coca-Cola performed above the industry average, which is an indication the companies are significant players in the industry. 

Constant growth stock valuation of Pepsi-Co and how it compares with its market price. 

The constant growth model is used to determine the intrinsic value of a stock on the assumption that future dividends grow at a constant rate each year. The approach assumes that current stock price is a function of rate of dividend growth, dividends and the investors required rate of return. The intrinsic stock price is determined as follows; 

P 0 =  =  , 

Yearly Dividend  Yearly Increase Rate 
2019 4 ∙ $0.955 = $3.79  ($3.79 - $3.59)/$3.59 = 0.05571 
2018: 4 ∙ $0.928 = $3.59  ($3.59 - $3.16)/$3.16= 0.13608 
2017: 4 ∙ $0.805 = $3.16  ($3.16 - $2.96)/$2.96 = 0.06756 
2016: 4 ∙ $0.753 = $2.96  ($2.96- $2.76)/$2.76 = 0.07246 
2015: 4 ∙ $0.703 = $2.76  ($2.76 - $2.53)/$2.53 = 0.09090 
2014: 4 ∙ $0.655 = $2.53   

Average yearly dividend growth rate = 

(0.09090 + 0.07246 + 0.06756 + 0.13608 + 0.05571) / 5 

= 0.42271 /5 

= 0.084542 

Assume the cost of capital is 12.5% 

Therefore; 

D1 = (0.955 + 0.955 + 0.955 + 0.955) = $2.865 

P0 = 2.865 / (0.125 – 0.084542) = $ 70.81 

The market price of Pepsi-Co as at close of business July,17,2020 was $ 134.66. The intrinsic value of the share is lower than the market price representing an overvaluation. The intrinsic value reflects the correct valuation of stock while forces of demand and supply determine the market price, and it is not the true value of the stock. The market forces of demand and supply have acted on the price leading to its rise over and price the correct valuation. Investor demand has exerted pressure on the share price as more investors are eager to partake in the company’s future. 

Capital Constraints 

To be competitive in the Beverages industry, Pepsi-CO needs to consider hard capital rationing and soft capital rationing. The hard-capital rationing may occur when Pepsi-Vo has problems raising funds, either through debt or Equity. Soft capital rationing, on the other hand, is a capital constraint that arises due to internal policies created by the company. For example, Pepsi-Co is likely to experience this type of limitation as it has a high requirement of return on capital to accept a project. 

Pepsi-Co is known to undertake several projects, and some of them go for a long time without fully being completed. This, as a result, leads to a drop in the company ROI. As a result of the decline in return on investments, Pepsi-Co management is typically prompted to impose caps on the number of new projects through increased capital cost for the original plans. By starting fewer new projects would allow Pepsi-Co to acquire more resources and time to complete the projects that are underway and not yet completed. 

Projects are very critical for any company. Investing in new projects ensures that the company remains productive, competitive, and progresses in terms of technology and all other growth assets. Pepsi-Co may also evaluate and solve this capital constraint by rationing tis capital to minimize the amount of money paid to the investors in terms of dividends. While the reduction in profits may hurt the share price, it has the desired overall effect. This way, the company can get funds to relieve its debts. 

In this regard, Pepsi-Co should ration its existing capital and efficiently invest in projects, giving it the chance to increase its bottom line, raise its dividend yield, or raise its actual dividend per share. Pepsi-Co should use capital budgeting techniques that involve the discounting of cash flows in determining the viability of a project. The net present value approach is used to determine which projects to invest in that will add value to the company. The company should also adopt project evaluation techniques such as the profitability index and accounting rate of return ( Financial Management: Theory and Practise , 2015) . These techniques help in highlighting risk profiles of projects and check the viability of projects so that the company can only invest in the most viable projects. 

Conclusion 

Pepsi-Co has had a mixed financial performance for the last three years as ROE ratio shows. The rate rose from 0.44 in 2017 to 0.96 in 2018 but declined rapidly from 2019 to 0.50. The drop in ROE came amidst increasing sales revenue and rising operating costs that impacted the ratio negatively. Pepsi-Co dividend payments are projected to grow at 8 percent in the next five years, and the stock has high demand at the stock exchange due to high dividends and capital gains. Pepsi-Co has to exercise capital rationing to invest in projects with the highest returns to guarantee value for the investors 

References 

Annual Reports and Proxy Information . PepsiCo, Inc. Official Website. (2020). Retrieved 19 July 2020, from https://www.pepsico.com/investors/financial-information/annual-reports-and-proxy-information 

Gibson, C. (2020).  Financial Reporting & Analysis  (13th ed., pp. Chapter 5: 199 - 208). Cengage Learning. 

Thompson, South-Western. (2015). Financial Management: Theory and Practise  (12th ed., pp. Chapter 11;377 - 400).

Illustration
Cite this page

Select style:

Reference

StudyBounty. (2023, September 14). Financial Returns and Capital Constraints- Pepsi-Co.
https://studybounty.com/financial-returns-and-capital-constraints-pepsi-co-essay

illustration

Related essays

We post free essay examples for college on a regular basis. Stay in the know!

Texas Roadhouse: The Best Steakhouse in Town

Running Head: TEXAS ROADHOUSE 1 Texas Roadhouse Prospective analysis is often used to determine specific challenges within systems used in operating different organizations. Thereafter, the leadership of that...

Words: 282

Pages: 1

Views: 93

The Benefits of an Accounting Analysis Strategy

Running head: AT & T FINANCE ANALLYSIS 1 AT & T Financial Analysis Accounting Analysis strategy and Disclosure Quality Accounting strategy is brought about by management flexibility where they can use...

Words: 1458

Pages: 6

Views: 81

Employee Benefits: Fringe Benefits

_De Minimis Fringe Benefits _ _Why are De Minimis Fringe Benefits excluded under Internal Revenue Code section 132(a)(4)? _ De minimis fringe benefits are excluded under Internal Revenue Code section 132(a)(4)...

Words: 1748

Pages: 8

Views: 196

Standard Costs and Variance Analysis

As the business firms embark on production, the stakeholders have to plan the cost of offering the services sufficiently. Therefore, firms have to come up with a standard cost and cumulatively a budget, which they...

Words: 1103

Pages: 4

Views: 180

The Best Boat Marinas in the United Kingdom

I. Analyzing Information Needs The types of information that Molly Mackenzie Boat Marina requires in its business operations and decision making include basic customer information, information about the rates,...

Words: 627

Pages: 4

Views: 98

Spies v. United States: The Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Espionage

This is a case which dealt with the issue of income tax evasion. The case determined that for income tax evasion to be found to have transpired, one must willfully disregard their duty to pay tax and engage in ways...

Words: 277

Pages: 1

Views: 120

illustration

Running out of time?

Entrust your assignment to proficient writers and receive TOP-quality paper before the deadline is over.

Illustration