Introduction
This paper will discuss the financial plan of Community Development Corporation of Butler County. The aim here is to make preparations for a challenging City Council meeting where a ‘city of affairs’ presentations will be made to the mayor and other council members. The presentation will show areas where significant cuts can be made to facilitate the funding of other critical areas. The particular financial plan is assessed herein; using information from the CDC’s budgets.
Fastest Growing Category of Expenditures
The following table shows that park facility maintenance is the fastest growing category of expenditure.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Expenditure | FY 2015-16 ($) | FY 2012-13 ($) | Change ($) | Percentage |
Executive expenses | 819,562 | 835,738 |
-16,176 |
-1.9% |
Human resource expenses | 334,021 | 285,635 |
48,386 |
14.4% |
Information Technology expenses | 75,055 | 67,589 |
7,466 |
9.9% |
Finance expenses | 440,238 | 372,744 |
67,494 |
15.3% |
Communications expenses | 249,173 | 207,410 |
41,763 |
16.7% |
Debt service expenses | 1,580,022 | 1,473,353 |
106,669 |
6.7% |
Tax collection expenses | 318,087 | 279,966 |
38,121 |
11.9% |
Insurance | 438,700 | 343,070 |
95,630 |
21.7% |
Land development | 356,710 | 294,301 |
62,409 |
17.4% |
Code enforcement | 572,348 | 442,982 |
129,366 |
22.6% |
Planning | 232,803 | 161,608 |
71,195 |
30.5% |
Customer service | 124,350 | 108,415 |
15,935 |
12.8% |
Park facility maintenance | 17,405 | 3,300 |
14,105 |
81.03% |
Park community events | 45,127 | 35,942 |
9,185 |
20.3% |
Park operation | 625,493 | 374,221 |
251,272 |
40.1% |
PW Administration | 492,968 | 437,727 |
55,241 |
11.2% |
Grounds maintenance | 861,875 | 823,161 |
38,714 |
4.4% |
Fleet maintenance | 293,304 | 233,339 |
59,965 |
20.4% |
Road maintenance | 1,211,390 | 1,245,809 |
-34,419 |
-2.8% |
Police patrol | 2,839,373 | 2,320,390 |
518,983 |
18.2% |
This table presents budget data for different expenditure categories for the financial years shown in Cranberry Township, Retrieved from https://www.cranberrytownship.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/1271 |
Figure 1: Fastest Growing Category of Expenditures.
General Property Tax
The total revenue for Cranberry Township is $17,956,804, whereas the general property tax is $2,998,615 (Cranberrytownship.org, 2015). This tax represents 16.7% of the city’s revenue as shown below:
Particulars | Amount |
Total Revenue | $17,956,804 |
Revenue from General Property Tax (GPT) | $2,998,615 |
Percentage of revenue from GPT | 16.7% |
Figure 2: Percentage Revenue from GPT. Data retrieved from Retrieved from https://www.cranberrytownship.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/1271
The following table shows how the GPT is growing in each year of the financial plan.
FY | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | 2015-16 |
General property Tax | 2,867,844 | 2,957,040 | 2,953,653 | 2,998,615 |
Percentage Growth | 103.11% | -0.11% | 101.52% |
Figure 3: Growth of GPT for Each Year. Data retrieved from Retrieved from https://www.cranberrytownship.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/1271
Capacity for Refunding/ Reorganizing Existing Debt Organizations
The reorganizations of debt obligations in the CDC is an appropriate way of addressing the debt problems that face the city. In the financial year under study, this coporation has various debt obligations such as a Promissory Note from CTVFD Relief Association, and General Obligation Bonds for Series 2010, 2003, 2011, and 2012. These obligations stretch for a number of years ranging from ten to twenty years. According to the 2015 annual budget, the debt service expenses category has an allocation of $1,580,022 whereas the total whereas the total budgeted expenditure stands at $19,549,100 against the proposed general fund revenue of $17,956,804. These figures show a budget deficit that is sufficient to warrant a discussion about reorganization of debt obligations (Cranberrytownship.org, 2015).
One of the strategies that can be utilized here is the reorganization of financial obligation in the corporation is to cover the budget deficit and enable the settling of the debts. Furthermore, the corporation can prioritize the debts that can obstruct the potential to perform fiscal obligations and council functions (Chen, Forsythe, Weikart & Williams, 2008). In addition to that, the corporation has an existing capacity to reduce the total fees, penalties, and rates brought about by the debts through a process of diligent debt repayment and prioritization. Similarly, the corporation can reduce the number of fees paid for other services and expense categories and use the saved funds for repayment of the debts (Weikart, Chen & Sermier, 2012).
Funding Alternatives for Debt Obligations
There is a need for Cranberry Township to prioritize on servicing the existing debt obligations to prevent an exponential rise of the city’s debt. There are various funding alternatives that are available for this city in the quest for debt management. For example, one of the most practical choices would be for the corporation can seek for grants from the federal government. Seeking one of the grant offers from the federal government, such as the project grants, would enable Cranberry Township to redirect some of its revenue to the servicing of debt obligations. The federal government gives close to twenty percent of its budget to states and local authorities to facilitate the funding of various services and projects (Dollery, Kortt & Grant, 2013).
Another alternative that can be used in the endeavor to support debt obligations is to increase the rates of various revenue streams such as Real Estate Tax, Licenses and Permits, as well as Interests and Rent among others (United Nations, 2002). Striking a favorable balance between continuity of operations and increased revenue collection will enable the corporation to have the funds to service the existing debts. However, such an initiative should not be focused on crucial institutions or operations but instead to revenue categories that can sustain the increased taxation. For example, the corporation can seek to increase the rates for Park Programs in the recreation category or Snow Removal in the public works category.
References
Chen, G. G., Forsythe, D. W., Weikart, L. A., & Williams, D. W. (2008). Budget Tools: Financial Methods in the Public Sector. SAGE.
Cranberrytownship.org, (2015). Cranberry Township 2015 Budget . Retrieved August 1, 2019, from https://www.cranberrytownship.org/Archive.aspx?AMID=60&Type=&ADID=
Dollery, B., Kortt, M. A., & Grant, B. (2013). Funding the future: Financial sustainability and infrastructure finance in Australian local government . Annandale, N.S.W: Federation Press.
United Nations. (2002). Financing for development: A critical global collaboration . New York: United Nations.
Weikart, L. A., Chen, G. G., & Sermier, E. (2012). Budgeting and Financial Management for Nonprofit Organizations. CQ Press.
Appendix 1
Budget Summary
General Fund Revenue
Department | Budget ($) |
Legislative | 15,536,115 |
General Government | 249,303 |
Community Development | 1,171,600 |
Public Safety | 158,500 |
Public Works | 83,836 |
Recreation | 757,450 |
Total | 17,956,804 |
General Fund Expenditures
Department | Budget ($) |
Legislative | 42,010 |
Miscellaneous | 1,910,000 |
General Government | 4,254,858 |
Community Development | 1,161,861 |
Customer Service | 124,350 |
Public Safety | 5,519,610 |
Public Works | 4,927,696 |
Engineering | 510,166 |
Recreation | 1,098,549 |
Total | 19,549,100 |