What can be done with the information?
The information can be used to weigh in on the debate about gun control and whether private citizens need to have guns in their houses. The statement has been stated in support of the reason to have guns. According to the statistics given, the ban on assault weapons does not reduce the rates of murder or crime (Spitzer, 2016) . However, allowing people to own guns in their homes presents a good chance of stopping burglaries in homes.
The information given in the statement gives the reason why private citizens need to have guns in their homes. Possession of firearms in homes dissuades outlaws from engaging in violent crime. Outlawing the guns for private citizens means that outlaws will have a more significant opportunity to have guns compared to private citizens (Worrall, 2014) . These citizens are at a higher risk of being victims of violent crime.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The statement helps people handle issues of whether they have the right to defend themselves against those who are out to cause them harm. Burglars and all those criminals in possession of guns or with the intention of committing a crime are usually dissuaded by the idea that the people on their attack list have weapons with them.
However, the information also helps the reader consider why there is a need to control the way people possess guns. Such possession has the potential of increasing the rate of crime or deaths from firearms especially when the supposed victim has a gun. Such ownership sparks scenarios such as shootouts between people who may not have adequate knowledge of gun use. However, in case of an attack, the person with the gun has a better chance of retaliating against the attack.
References
Spitzer, R. J. (2016). Politics of Gun Control. New York, NY: Routledge.
Worrall, J. L. (2014). Crime control in America: What works? New York, NY: Pearson Higher
Ed.
