FBI: is an international law enforcement agency located in the United States of America and its major roles are to protect the country from terror attacks, cybercrime attacks as regards high-technology crimes, combat public corruption as well as protection of the country against the operations of foreign intelligence among other tasks.
Domestic Security Alliance Council: DSAC is a tactical partnership based in America, which involves the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and the private sector to facilitate smooth communication and enhance effective information exchanges based on a timely basis. It primarily aims at keeping safe, the critical infrastructure of the US to make it more secure from cyber-related crimes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Department of Homeland Security: this law enforcement agency is located in America, with the core mandate of ensuring cyber-security, counterterrorism, immigration and border security as well as disaster response and recovery in the country.
The Nigeria Criminal Code Act of 1990, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission Act of 2004 and the Advance Free Fraud and Related Offences Act of 2006 are examples of laws regarding cybercrime in Nigeria (Olusola, Ogunlere, Semiu & Yinka, 2013). The 1990 Act helped in apprehending the criminal by referring to the fact that cybercrime is a violation punishable with reference to the Act since it involves receipt of property through deception and pretense. Again, the 2004 Act prohibits counterfeiting and illegal charge transfers whose ultimate ramifications are associated with financial losses (Olusola, Ogunlere, Semiu & Yinka, 2013). Finally, the 2006 Act refers to false representation either orally or in writing, pretense and deliberate intention of fraudulently owing stolen goods. Therefore, with reference to the sections described above of the acts, the Nigerian laws regarding cybersecurity greatly helped in the investigation and apprehension of the criminal.
The need for most politicians to cause disruptions to other nations by hacking their respective databases has greatly facilitated cybercrime. The political class majorly involved in this act includes ideological extremists and some transnational criminal groups that finance hawkers to engage in cyber-related crimes to harm other rival parties. Again, the reluctance in passing critical cybersecurity bills has led to increased facilitation of cyber-related crimes.
The law enforcement agency in the US can mitigate cybercrimes in the land with the aim of protecting the public. For instance, the agency has adequate police and related units to enhance flexibility regarding the approaches adopted to tackle cybersecurity issues (Campbell, 2010). Again, the proper personnel help in the in-depth understanding of criminal behaviors and identification of the most vulnerable groups; thus, the agency can comfortably tackle online crimes.
Collaboration among law enforcement agencies is quite crucial in investigating cyber crimes. For instance, the partnership between The Department of Homeland Security's Information Network (HSIN) with the European Law Enforcement and some private sectors helped in tracking cybercriminals across both geographic and jurisdictional boundaries (Binns, 2017). And since the agency owns and operates approximately 85% of all critical infrastructures, it helped in detecting threats throughout the investigations as it regards the case. However, the investigations were primarily based on national intelligence instead of sourcing some vital cybercrime information from private sectors. This limitation can be streamlined by involving in strategic partnerships to enhance robust cybersecurity programs in the country.
Note that the US law was facilitated in all her agencies in relation to the cybercrime case in question. The United States reciprocates their laws in regard to cybercrimes that currently affect the international community. For example, the US reciprocated her laws in this case by investigating whether the Nigerian court that issues the judgment had jurisdiction, whether the suspect was given a comprehensive notification prior to the incidence and finally if some aspects of fraud were involved during the vitiation of the proceedings (Morrow, n.d). Hence, the law of reciprocity holds and prohibits judgments that are contrary to the public policy of Nigeria.
There is an ongoing cooperative relationship between the US and other international law enforcement agencies. The US helps international agencies in identifying criminals that obtain money, power, influence and other commercial gains through fraudulent means. Therefore, it is necessary to cooperate with international agencies to combat international organized crimes as soon as possible (US Department of Justice, 2008).
References
Olusola, M., Ogunlere S., Semiu, A. & Yinka, A. (2013). Cyber Crimes and Cyber Laws in Nigeria. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES). Volume 2, Issue 4: Pages 19-25. Retrieved 22/7/2018 from http://www.theijes.com/papers/v2-i4/part.%20(5)/D0245019025.pdf
Campbell, A. (2010). Cyber Crime Strategy. The Stationery Office Limited. Retrieved 22/7/2018 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228826/7842.pdf
Binns, C. (2017). Law Enforcement Partnerships Enhance Cybercrime Investigations. American Society for Public Administration. Retrieved 22/7/2018 from https://patimes.org/law-enforcement-partnerships-enhance-cybercrime-investigations/
US Department of Justice. (2008). Overview of the Law Enforcement Strategy to Combat International Organized Crimes. Retrieved 22/7/2018 from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-icitap/legacy/2015/04/23/04-23-08combat-intl-crime-overview.pdf
Morrow, J. D. (n.d). How Does Reciprocity Work? Evidence from the Laws of War. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved 22/7/2018 from https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/spring05_Morrow.pdf
