The perspective that is presented by the maximalist is that if child abuse occurs, serious and drastic measures have to be taken to ensure that the problem is solved (Benbassat, Elyasaf, & Sipper, 2013). They also give prevalence to solving the problem. They argue that if a child is abused and then it is overlooked or sometimes taken before a solution to the problem is addressed; there will be far-reaching effects that solving might not be easy. They also argue that if a child abuse issue is overlooked, then a solution to the issue might not be found. For instance, if a child goes missing, the maximalist would argue that this is a big problem and all possible efforts need to be directed towards finding the lost child. This has to happen immediately the child has been reported missing. The minimalist have a more liberal approach to the issue of child abuse; they do not put much seriousness or prevalence to the problem as the maximalist (Chomsky, 2014). The minimalist view the issue of child abuse as exaggerated and does not need to be handled with any seriousness or immediacy. For instance, if a child goes missing the minimalist would not view this as a big problem, no effort would be put towards ensuring that the child is found. They do not see the issue of child abuse as a serious issue. I would lean towards the maximalist side; this is because I believe that issues of child abuse are serious and needs to be handled with seriousness. Efforts need to be directed towards ensuring that the children are safe if an incident of child abuse occurs it should be dealt with immediately.
References
Benbassat, A., Elyasaf, A., & Sipper, M. (2013). More or less? Two approaches to evolving game-playing strategies. In Genetic Programming Theory and Practice X (pp. 171-185). Springer New York.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Chomsky, N. (2014). The minimalist program . MIT press.
