Corporations like Nestle and others engage in programs which support the promotion of healthier population in their spheres of influence. However, the actual benefit of such programs to society is hardly felt because Nestlé and other corporations are driven by a desire to make profits over a healthy population. Alleging that Nestlé has made Brazilians unhealthier may seem subjective, but obesity and overweight cases are trending upwards. Efforts by lobbyists supporting a healthy population have unmatched political and economic power before Nestle and similar multinational corporations. For instance, Nestlé would rather fund political activities in the host country than donate to promote the health of the people who develop obesity from consuming processed foods. Nestlé has perfected the art of integrating the host nation society into its business model to ensure that demand for its products supersede the need for people to buy healthy products from farmers. For instance, the company strives to ensure that the inputs to its products are sustainably produced from the farms. Conversely, processing the food and selling it to people who eventually develop obesity does account for anything else but revenue generation.
Nestlé creates employment opportunities for people in host countries but addressing obesity as a health issue is impossible. Statistically, Brazil's urbanizing population is marked by increases in the people's disposable income, but nestle argues that such characteristics are an opportunity to expand into new markets. Consequently, Nestlé is right to claim that it has enabled people to access safe products but it fails to acknowledge its product is one of the leading cause of obesity to people of all ages. Therefore, Nestlé values profit more than Brazilians who consume its processed food.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Greater Oversight of Corporations by Governments
Nestle quotes the creation of employment and engagement of farmers to sustainably produce the company’s inputs. However, a comparative analogy of Nestlé in Brazil shows that the annual rate of new obesity cases is more than the number of people employed by the company annually. Consequently, there is little economic value being added to the Brazilian economy because of the rising cases of obesity and obesity-related complications. Nestlé may argue that it has improved the living standards. Nestlé and other corporations have been bypassing legislation, and in some cases, influencing policy decisions made against their businesses. Ruling regimes have been failing the Brazilians through acceptance of donations especially during campaigns but at the expense of allowing Nestlé and similar corporations to sell over refined foods to the population. Nevertheless, one thing is clear, it is the Brazilian government, and any other developing country, initiative to curb the skyrocketing trends of obesity by exercising greater oversight over Nestlé.
A good corporate citizen should actually sustainably produce goods and services without compromising the care health of the people. Understandably, Nestlé claims to have improved the safety of foods consumed by the fast-urbanizing Brazilian society, but the company is strategically taking advantage of the growth in the people’s incomes cause to ensure that the masses are addicted to refined foods. Additionally, allowing people to consume the foods before paying is another way of ensuring addiction to Nestlé's products. Furthermore, the food adverts reaching children are detrimental to future generations' ability to embrace the healthier foods because the children will grow up with loyalty to junk food from companies like Nestlé. Therefore, the government should exercise greater oversight of the corporation despite their immense economic and political power. Ruling regimes in Brazil should make Nestlé pay for their unethical production of food products to the Brazilian society. Governments should ensure that the implementation of policies is free from interference from corporations.