There are a lot of differences between popular and scholarly sources. First, scholarly sources are written by experts in a given field of study and they are aimed at disseminating or sharing original resources or comprehensive analysis of findings from other research. Popular source, on the other hand, is not necessarily written by an expert in a given field and they are aimed informing a wider array of readers or audience. Secondly, scholarly sources are properly cited in form of footnote or bibliography while popular sources have no citations, as they are not referenced. Thirdly, scholarly sources are lengthy and always contain many pages whereas popular source are short and many are written in one page (Georgetown University Library, 2018).
Fourthly, scholarly sources always have sober and serious look because they contain graphs and charts. They have few glossy pages or exciting picture. Conversely, scholarly sources have attractive photographs, pictures, and advertisement. Finally, scholarly sources are not easy to understand because they are technical in nature while popular sources have simple language that can easily be understood by readers (Georgetown University Library, 2018).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Summary of Sources
Sabia, J. J. (2014). The Minimum Wage: No Feature, all Bugs . Journal Of Policy Analysis & Management, 33(4), 1043. doi:10.1002/pam.21788
The source by Sabia mainly focuses on the effect of minimum wage on effect of minimum wage on poverty as explained by Bernstein and Shierholz. According to Bernstein and Shierholz, the poverty line is flawed because it is based on out-of-date metrics. They further argue that analyzing the effect of minimum wage is important for policymaking. The analysis that was conducted by Bernstein and Shierholz on the available data showed that an increase in minimum wage does not have significant effect to income-to-needs ration (INR). The most people affected by minimum wage are middle-income earners (Sabia, 2014). At the same time, they argue that minimum wage has no significant adverse effect on employment. However, Bernstein and Shierholz maintain that there is need to increase minimum wage because there are more winners than losers.
There is limited level of biases in the article because the analysis is based on relevant data. Bernstein and Shierholz used reliable data to analyze relationship between minimum wage and poverty. Therefore, the information and information contained in the article is reliable. The strength of the article is that is based on the valid data collected by various scholars. However, the limitation is that Bernstein and Shierholz relied on one source of data to conduct the analysis.
Winerip, M. (1996, May 10). Minimum wage? As one man finds, it's really a matter of perspective. New York Times. p. A14.
The article by Winerip is majorly about minimum wage and how both employers and employees feel about it. Business owners and employers like Mr. Bobbitt are against an increase in minimum wage because it takes revenue from them, leading to low profit. For instance, Mr. Bobbitt argues that he would lose about $80,000 if the minimum wage is raised (Winerip, 1996). In the contrary, the majority of employees, about 80%, feel that there is need to increase minimum wage because it increases their income. Therefore, the controversial debate on minimum wage is based on interests.
The information contained in the article can be biased because it is majorly based on personal opinion about minimum wage. However, it is reliable since it largely depends on first-hand information from people. The strength of the article is that it combines both primary and secondary sources of information, which makes it easier to analyze the authenticity of the information. In addition, it has limitation because it is not easy to determine the accuracy from personal opinion about an issue.
Visual Cues
Scholarly source had graph that was not the case in the popular source identified. Graph was used to explain the information contained in the article.
Scholarly article was written in such a way that it captured real-time basis, which was not the case in popular source.
Scholarly source had incitation and bibliography while popular source was not referenced
Scholarly article contained technical information such as numerical data that was not easy to understand. In the contrary, popular source had simple information and data
Scholarly article was based on researched information while information in popular article was mainly based on personal opinion.
References
Georgetown University Library. (2018). What's the Difference between scholarly journals and Popular Magazines? : Why does it Matter? Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/scholarly-vs-popular
Sabia, J. J. (2014). The Minimum Wage: No Feature, all Bugs. Journal Of Policy Analysis & Management , 33(4), 1043. doi:10.1002/pam.21788.
Winerip, M. (1996, May 10). Minimum wage? As one man finds, it's really a matter of perspective. New York Times . p. A14.
