Personal privacy is a fundamental right that is enshrined in the constitution. The most affected area in personal privacy is the data sector. Data collection may include data on health or finances. This is the most crucial areas affected data thefts and hackers. Legislations on personal privacy protection have been in the EU since 1970 while in the US the laws were introduced through the fourth amendment and the third party doctrine ( Cole, Fabbrini, & Schulhofer, 2017 ). The European Union and the US have different legislative measures to ensure personal data privacy. Measures placed by the EU are more stringent as compared to those adopted by the US.
Protected persons
Measures adopted by the EU are universal in nature. The laws protect every person within the EU borders regardless of their nationality. In contrast, the US favors its citizens. The law protects only the US citizens and discriminates against non-citizens ( Cole, Fabbrini, & Schulhofer, 2017 ). Personal privacy within the EU is considered a fundamental right that cannot be alienated from anyone, unlike the US, which considers it a privilege to be enjoyed by its citizens only.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Coverage
The scope of application of personal privacy laws varies between the EU and US. EU laws on personal privacy are open in the areas that they cover. The subject of scope can be debated within the EU laws while the US laws are restricted to countries and records covered ( Cole, Fabbrini, & Schulhofer, 2017 ).
Approach
Personal privacy should be considered a fundamental right in every country around the globe. The government should take initiatives to ensure that all people are protected. With the changing state of surveillance, data can be used as tools to infringe on the rights of others. The US and the EU are making efforts to streamline privacy policies between the two frontiers ( Fahey, 2018 ). The US Department on privacy is using this front to borrow and incorporate principles that have been found to be used within the EU. The US should be categorical in defining its position to ensure that everyone within its border is protected from victimization.
References
Cole, D., Fabbrini, F., & Schulhofer S. (2017). S urveillance, Privacy and Trans-Atlantic Relations. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing
Fahey, E. (2018). Institutionalisation beyond the Nation State: Transatlantic Relations: Data, Privacy and Trade Law . New York, NY: Springer.
