Ethical dilemmas refer to complex or difficult situations that often carry mental conflicts. The dilemma occurs when the moral imperative act is disregarded and the outcome is upheld. According to the deontological approach that concerning the noble cause, the result is usually insignificant, as compared to the moral intention as a particular decision is being made. The Nobel causes asses the morality of one's actions, disregarding the consequences of the decision. It is imperative for law enforcers to stay on the ground in regards to their duties and responsibilities, regardless of the projected aftermath. The law enforcers are bound by the law to perform their duties, all other factors withstanding (Allen & Sawhney, 2009).
In addition, Duties are expected to be executed even thou they may lead to personal or even professional consequences. Therefore, a law enforcer may be required to use unethical, illegal and immoral means for the desired goal, in the perspective that it is done for a greater good. The police are under oath or are committed to delivering no matter the surrounding circumstances. The Nobel cause corruption justifies the saying "the end justifies the means". For instance, when promoting peace, the focus is the greater good of the immediate society being affected by unstable security concerns (Caldero & Crank, 2014). The offices may engage in activities that compromise their morals, reputation of the agency and ethics. It is morally right to imprison one that causes distress in the community. For example, a police officer is required to make a community safe and a group of criminals is raising the alarm at the high rates of crime in that area, the police officer may decide to plant evidence to arrest the unreachable criminals causing mayhem in the community.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
On the other hand, a police officer may opt to accept the prevailing circumstances since most of the criminals tend to have powerful connections with the high and might in society, thus, escape conviction, causing the officers more frustrations as the matter is out of their hands. However, the noble cause has transformed the police officers to use this approach as a scapegoat, justifying their actions, compromising the safety of the society (Evans & MacMillan, 2014).
There are numerous reasons for the adoption of the noble cause corruption. Among the reason, the approach helps to collect evidence that successfully convicts the offenders. This is done by tampering with the evidence that may cause the criminal being free, assuming court witnesses and evidence. The law enforces employ deceptive measure during investigations. This can be done by reducing the prosecution period and that of gathering evidence for no later than twenty-four hours. Thus, the noble cause will demand to create a balance of utility, which demands the implementation of utilitarian ethics, which provides for deceptive investigations.
In addition, the Nobel cause is efficient during undercover investigations. The officers bend the law to accommodate crime –lab investigators, who examine and disclose the movement of the targets. This traps the suspected criminal to commit an unintended crime during a concealed danger. Thus, the use of the Nobel cause offers protection of its police officers since criminals may have an idea about the investigation and set a target to harm the officers. However, the undercover operations protect the offers from any form of attacks, kidnapping, or even the death of the officers (Killion & Dempski, 2000).
The use of unethical and immoral nature of the law by the police is justified if the unethical means led to ethical consequences, thus the goal is ethical and deemed right. Therefore, the unethical actions taken by the law officer are ignored and gives glory to what was achieved, focusing more on the effects rather than the cause. However, this notion disregards the deceptions that are made to contain the innocent. This aspect is completely ignored as the noble cause focuses on the intended effect. Therefore, the ripple effect that affects the innocent is undetermined and only upholds positive effects.
Moreover, the noble cause is applicable through interrogations. During investigations and crime-labs, law enforcement tends to influence the prosecution. The law enforces tamper with the interrogations, through mental coercion and deception. The police tend to issue threats, promises and creating confusion through contradiction to achieve a particular target. Among the methods used by the police is calling the questioning during the interrogation. The police misinterpret the information given, exaggerating on the consequences of the offense. The police may also pretend to be lawyers or even priest as they try to create mental deception and in extreme cases, they use physical coercion. The deceptive measures during interrogations promote the greater good (Gottschalk, 2011).
The society gives unbearable judgment to serious criminal offenders and demands harsh judgment, the society is in desperate need to get rid of such offenders. Thus, the noble cause of corruption has become a popular practice in recent times. The society hastily wants to get rid of offenders in a faster and much easier way through noble cause corruption. This violates the right of the offenders. The Nobel cause corruption overlooks the past criminal record by the police.
Furthermore, arrogance, brutality, and weak supervision contribute to the level of Nobel cause corruption by the police. Most find an easier and fewer stress means of attaining the root cause of the matter. The police officers use approach to avoid the tedious nature of investigations and gathering evidence. Misconduct of the police officers denies legal rights and violates the law for their own selfish interests. No matter how tempting it is to seek a much-simplified means, the officers cannot legitimize the Nobel cause corruption by throwing away all the set rules, for the greater good (Pollock, 2007).
Conclusion
The noble cause of corruption is process oriented, it does not matter how results are produced, as long as the desired outcome is attained. For instance, In the case of police officers on cars patrol pass by a local street, they notice juveniles throwing snowballs at the passing cars by the road. The officer decides to abandon his car, and runs towards the juveniles and builds a snowman at their front yard. According to the deontological approach of the noble cause corruption, the police officers' actions are vindicated, irrespective of the action taken. Thus, the approach is process-oriented. Law enforcement officers utilize unethical, illegal measures to obtain desired results.
The Nobel cause corruption proves the application of force and violating of the law for the greater good of a peaceful society can be rightful, ethical and moral especially if it is exclusively done for the greater good. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the officers to ensure the agency is aware of the undocumented behaviour as they pursue investigations and the gathering of evidence. The agency ought to be aware of their moral as well as their ethical decisions, in and off the job.
References
Allen, J. M., & Sawhney, R. (2009). Administration and Management in Criminal Justice. New York: SAGE.
Caldero, M. A., & Crank, J. P. (2014). Police Ethics: The Corruption of Noble Cause. London: Routledge.
Evans, D. R., & MacMillan, C. S. (2014). Ethical Reasoning in Criminal Justice and Public Safety. New York: Emond Montgomery Publications, Limited,.
Gottschalk, P. (2011). International Journal of Law and Management. Management challenges in law enforcement: the case of police misconduct and crime , 169-181.
Killion, S. W., & Dempski, K. (2000). Legal and Ethical Issues. New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Pollock, J. M. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice . Belmont, California: Cengage Learning.
