Energy pricing attracts conflicting constructs from politicized individuals, who discredit its sustainability when contrasted with non-renewable energy. Lesson 2 formulated a substructure to discredit populist myths' viability, which advances false notions concerning the plausibility of cheap wind and solar energy, the feasibility of mining coal and impact on posterity, and the promotion of biofuel as a sustainable energy source that will serve future generations. While the myths appear plausible, politicized individuals proffer substantial arguments backed by facts and statistics on the flaws of the scientists' beliefs that renewable energy is sustainable and will serve posterity adequately compared to non-renewable energy.
Scientists' reasoning that households that utilize wind and solar energy cut costs are a flawed perception because they disregard the assemblage costs of machinery, which are prerequisites to manufacture the energy type (Class notes). Further, science argues that the United States should vehemently promote renewable energy as a ticket to its freedom from over-reliance on renewable energy quickly depleted. While the idea appears considerate of the country's posterity, populists argue that the transport industry consumes most energy used in the United States, and renewable energy has curtailed power to meet the increasing demand for oil transportation.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Additionally, scientists proffer that using non-renewable coal and oil fuel cannot sustain the United States' economy in the future, which is expanding at an alarming rate. While the argument appears viable, its weakness is embedded in the fact that scientists' future" is undefined, and that by 2035, 79% of the country’s energy needs will be served by coal and oil effectively (Class notes). Therefore, their belief that coal and oil energy sources are unsustainable in the long-run is backward-thinking. Finally, science argues that biofuel energy is sustainable and should be considered the future's principal energy source, disregarding that the energy type suffers inefficiencies. Therefore, the notion that renewable energy should be prioritized for posterity's sake is wrong and should be discouraged, as supported by Lesson 2.
