Anita had a positive relationship with the judge she was working with. She had many responsibilities and was allowed relative independence in her work. The judge asked Anita out after working for three months for him. Anita courteously declined the invitation citing that it might jeopardize their working relationship. The judge pressed on. He would even use work situations to discuss sexual-related matters. This included the judge bragging about his sexual prowess and narrating pornographic material. Anita repeatedly refused to talk about these subjects.
This is a case of sexual coercion. Coercion is the use of emotional and situational manipulation to convince someone to do something they are not willing to take part in, like performing certain sexual acts or being sexual. It is an unwanted sexual activity that takes place when a victim is tricked, threatened, pressured, or coerced in a non-physical way. It can sometimes make the victim think he or she owes sex to someone. Sexual coercion is usually from a perpetrator with power over the victim, like a landlord, a teacher, or a boss.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The problem of sexual coercion by those in positions of power in professional and institutional settings is far from being tackled legally. The existing laws fail to provide a suitable remedy to deal with sexual coercion. One of such failure is to accurately define and outline the offenses and harms of sexual coercion in professional and institutional settings. The reality denies the actual experiences of sexual coercion victims. The sexual harassment legal framework cannot comprehensively account for sexual coercion because it does not fit tidily into this legal rulebook. Legislating sexual coercion, however, might not be the solution. The society and the legal mechanism still continues to place blame on victims of rape. It is best for the victim of sexual coercion to leave the situation as fast as possible.
