There are many advantages of immigration reforms in the United States of America. Some of the benefits listed by the member Congress include the increase in the USA economy's efficiency, an increase in entrepreneurship in the country, and an increase in national security. Besides, immigration can reduce the country's deficit ( Chau, 2003) . The Bureau of Labour Statistics has done research using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches to analyze the importance of reforming immigration in the country ( Chau, 2003) . For many years the bureau has used the gathered data to make meaningful immigration decisions in the country. The success of a decision is determined by the kind of research methodology used by an institution. The institution can use a qualitative approach to determine how and why the reforms have to be implemented. Besides, the institutions can also gather data using quantitative methods to track the immigration reforms' productivity ( Chau, 2003) . However, in many cases, many institutions might opt to incorporate qualitative and quantitative approaches to determine the reasons for immigration reforms. All methods are applicable since many researchers might be comfortable with a particular research approach. The USA's immigration reform decision can effectively use all the techniques, although each method has its benefits and disadvantages.
The Qualitative Approach
The qualitative approach focuses on the views of all the stakeholders who are involved in immigration reforms. The qualitative approach has no theory, paradigm, or obvious set of practices. The best definition of qualitative research is that the approach produces findings and results without using any statistical procedures or any form of a quantification ( Suh et al., 2009) . Since the approach deals with a person's movement, behaviors, cultural phenomena, and international relations between nations, it can affect immigration reforms ( Chau, 2003) . The qualitative approach seeks to analyze the subjective meaning of social events such as immigration by getting immigrants' views and from unstandardized data or images. After getting the data, the stakeholders can now know the sense of reforming migration ( Suh et al., 2009) . Some of the methods of research include surveys, interviews, observation. The qualitative research can use the survey method to get views and ideas from immigrants' immigration offices. The surveys might be done anonymously by using questionnaires, checklists, inquiries, and responses through emails ( Suh et al., 2009) . The survey method is inexpensive, efficient, and uses a simple analysis of data while incorporating extensive data and subject size.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
There is a large number of reasons why immigration offices should use qualitative research to reform. First, the study can capture the most delicate details of change in attitudes within the immigration departments and the immigrant's feelings about the processes of traveling ( Suh et al. 2009) . There could be a season where the immigration services are conducted efficiently, and through qualitative research, the researchers can capture the customers' gratitude. The second advantage is that the research is more flexible in approach to change the way of asking questions to improve responses from the immigrants. Besides, the research method allows the researchers to be more vigilant in prompting the respondents to a specific area of questions ( Suh et al. 2009) . Lastly, the research enables direct interaction with the immigrants and immigration departments, allowing first-hand information about immigration through a survey method.
However, qualitative research has disadvantages. The first issue is about the sample size of immigration reforms. For instance, the information on a sample of ten immigrants from two hundred immigrants can raise doubts about the information's accurate reflections ( Suh et al. 2009) . Also, qualitative research is often affected by the issue of bias. In most cases, the researchers might dwell on the sample of biased interviewees with the information required. The third advantage is that the research encounters the impossibility of assembling the surveys' participants while there could be no standards or criteria to ask questions ( Suh et al. 2009) . The respondents, such as migrants, might lack the skills of answering questions.
The Quantitative Approach
Quantitative research emphasizes the quantification in the gathering and investigating data through statistics, mathematics, and numerical analysis of data. The data is obtained through questionnaires or surveys. The quantitative research explains the relationship between independent variables such as human rights and dependent variables such as racial inclination in a population ( Leiken & Brooke, 2006) . A quantitative research method, such as survey research, can get data from various types of respondents. The research tries to explain 'how much,' 'how many,' and to what extent the immigration reforms will benefit the country ( Leiken & Brooke, 2006) . Besides, the research seeks to measure how the reforms can be effectuated in the country ( Leiken & Brooke, 2006) . A statistical technique usually stimulates the data to reasonable conclusions, such as measuring individual targets, rank employees, and justify termination of immigration rights. Quantitative research can help in capturing real immigration activities and elevate what needs attention in reformation.
The research findings can generalize a whole department of immigration services because its information represents the entire population. Besides, assessing the data, sampling, and analysis takes a short time compared to qualitative research ( Leiken & Brooke, 2006) . Another advantage is that the research can accommodate variables that are concerned about the immigration reforms. The variables are also used to get exact information about the reforms.
The research fails to give out the inner meaning of social phenomena such as immigration. There is no confidential information about someone or something since the research deals with samples. Another disadvantage is that the research gives general information about the reforms ( Leiken & Brooke, 2006) . For instance, the research has no access to full immigration phenomena to dwell on the matters arising from that particular season.
The Mixed Method Approach
Both qualitative and quantitative research are used together by a researcher to enhance their interests and topics. The mixed-method involves analyzing quantitative and qualitative data using vigorous procedures to collect data in an appropriate sample size ( Zohrabi, 2013) . Later the analysis is used to frame the importance of reforming immigration ( Zohrabi, 2013) . The mixed-method is a community-based approach where all participants are allowed to engage in many phases of the research to bring about immigration reforms.
The main advantages of mixed methods include a first-hand comparison between qualitative and quantitative data. Similarities and contradictions can help the researcher pick the best method ( Zohrabi, 2013) . Secondly, there is a rich reflection of the participants' views on immigration reforms. The mixed-methods also offer scholarly interactions and provide flexibility in methodological designs and trials.
The main limitation is the complexity of the evaluation and analysis of data. The research also requires a multidisciplinary team of qualified researchers to conduct reform analysis ( Zohrabi, 2013) . Finally, the method involves the use of increased resources, such as human and finance.
References
Chau, N. H. (2003). Concessional Amnesty and the Politics of Immigration Reforms. Economics & Politics , 15 (2), 193-224. https://doi,.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00122.
Leiken, R. S., & Brooke, S. (2006). The Quantitative Analysis of Terrorism and Immigration: An Initial Exploration. Terrorism and Political Violence , 18 (4), 503-521. https://doi.org./10.1080/09546550600880294 .
Suh, E. E., Kagan, S., & Strumpf, N. (2009). Cultural Competence in Qualitative Interview Methods with Asian Immigrants. Journal of Transcultural Nursing , 20 (2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/104365960830059 .
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed-Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability, and Reporting Findings. Theory & Practice in Language Studies , 3 (2). doi:10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-26.
