Software development may be conducted using the Agile and software development lifecycle (SDLC) approaches. Agile uses the sprint planning procedure, while SDLC has a unique protocol for software creation and implementation. Firms may implement technology, such as the Robotic Process Automation Process (RPA), to advance organizational success. There are several differences between the Agile and SDLC approaches of software development when used in the development of softwares, such as RPA.
The Agile and SDLC approaches to software development have several unique differences. SDLC has the project initiation, requirement analysis, specification and design, system selection and development, quality assurance, implementation, and maintenance steps (Assigned Readings). In contrast, Agile uses the sprint planning approach in which a team selects a product backlog of items, creates goals on how to complete the identified tasks, and plans to achieve primary deliverables (Agile Alliance, 2020). SDLC is sequential, and each step is sharply defined, while Agile does not indicate the sequence of developing an application. Additionally, Agile involves differentiated teams with different tasks, where each team member handles a unique element of software development. For instance, person A may handle specification and design, person B may create quality assurance techniques, and person C may determine how the software will be maintained and supported. In contrast, SDLC requires persons A, B, and C to be present in the software’s development. SDLC does not involve the designation of different steps of the software’s development to various team members. Team members cannot work individually to create different aspects of the software. Therefore, Agile and SDLC differ significantly in their software development processes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I think the SDLC approach would work best for the RPA implementation. The disadvantage of using Agile to develop RPA is that team members only meet to present the final product. There are no continuous reviews of how each member is performing their task. The software is divided into different items that are assigned to various team members, who only assemble after the planned period of the project’s completion has expired. Thus, the possibility of errors is high because team planning only happens once a month. For instance, a month-long project will only have 8 hours planning period. I believe successful softwares should have the team working together through every step of its creation. SDLC has the advantage of team members working together for every step of the application’s process. For instance, team members will brainstorm on the need to initiate the use of RPA (Tempel, 2020). The whole team will then execute suggestions. The team will perform the requirement analysis as a whole, where everyone will actively share their ideas. Afterward, the best requirement will be selected, and all the team members will execute the next step. SDLC actively involves all team members during a project’s life cycle. Thus, the RPA would receive maximum attention from experienced team input. In contrast, using the Agile approach to develop RPA may result in several errors and confusion as team members work individually as long as the planning process has been completed and goals are identified. Thus, the SDLC technique would suffice for developing the RPA software.
Software development may be performed using different techniques, such as SDLC and Agile. The two development processes have different protocols for software developers. should consider. In my opinion, the SDLC approach would be best to develop the RPA software.
References
Agile Alliance. (2020). Sprint Planning. Retrieved from https://www.agilealliance.org/glossary/sprint-planning/#q=~(infinite~false~filters~(postType~(~'page~'post~'aa_book~'aa_event_session~'aa_experience_report~'aa_glossary~'aa_research_paper~'aa_video)~tags~(~'sprint*20planning))~searchTerm~'~sort~false~sortDirection~'asc~page~1)
Assigned Readings. (n.d.). Session 6: Systems Development Lifecycle (Pdf document).
Tempel, C. (2020, February 24). Robotic process automation & Agile. Retrieved from https://www.agilealliance.org/resources/experience-reports/robotic-process-automation-agile/
