The movie "Erin Brockovich" was an insightful and informative film that brought light to the main problems with a big corporation that was using chemicals to clean water and to cover-up trials that monitored. The movie was fair to choose the company and uncover how it treated the little guy, Charles Embry and the people of Hinkley. Erin and Ed Masry work together to bring down a big electric and gas corporation in California that was causing water pollution in Hinkley city. Erin comes upon unusual papers while working at the law firm. She decides to do investigations on the issue, and after research, she realizes there is unsafe Chromium VI in the city's water system. At first, Masry is reluctant when Erin asks him to assist file litigation against the company, but he later settles to team up with Erin to gain fairness to the people.
Erin and Masry learnt that most complications and diseases among Hinkley citizens could be directly linked to excessive Chromium VI exposure. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) had offered multiple acts of generosity to cover up the issue ( Soderbergh et al., 2000) . Therefore, Erin and Masry had to talk to the residents and convince them to take action. PG&E deceived the citizens that the chemical was harmless, not cautioning them that they would be in danger. The people declined Erin and Masry's offers and continued to get exposed to Chromium VI, uninformed of its side effects. Erin gets more evidence to bring down the corporation after meeting with several area residents. She visits the city's water board to research the water value report to ascertain that the corporation was aware that they violated safety concerns by exposing the people to excess Chromium VI ( Soderbergh et al., 2000) . Masry and Erin collaborated with a law firm in Los Angeles to form direct-action litigation against the corporation. Finally, the victims of the city of Hinkley were granted $333 million.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Charles Embry had been a former employee at the corporation. One night, Erin sees him in a bar as she had gone to meet with a resident of Hinkley. Erin realizes that she had seen the guy in two meetings with Hinkley residents. Charles introduces himself to Erin after some scratchy conversation. Finally, Erin can talk to Charles after realizing that he had been attempting to talk to her. Charles states that his cousin, who was also employed at PG&E, had just died painfully due to interaction with the corporation's poison. It shows that the corporation does not care for the employees as well as residents of Hinkley city. They are unsympathetic and are only concerned about their gains and not the harm they are causing to other people. Charles also informs Erin that the corporation tasked him with extinguishing documents, but he still had them ( Soderbergh et al., 2000) . Charles gives the documents to Erin that help them in the lawsuit. The documents included a 1966 memo that proved the company headquarters was aware of the contaminated water and directed PG&E not to reveal it.
In conclusion, the film was a great way to bring fairness to Hinkley city. Charles was also willing to find justice for the people. He kept relevant documents about the corporation even when they expected him to destroy them. Erin shows that compassion in interrelating and upholding relationships with clients is very relevant. Erin knew every file by heart because he interacted and talked to every family in the city. Clients believe in most personal persons who share emotional understandings and show fanatical obligation to their job. Therefore, if injustice is happening, everyone has a right to fight against the issue no matter how influential the conflicting side could be.
Reference
Soderbergh, S., Roberts, J., Finney, A., & Eckhart, A. (2000). Erin Brockovich . Columbia Tristar Home Video.
