Q1
The North Carolina Supreme Court is made up of Justices who are comprised of the Chief Justice and six Associate Justices.
Q2
The current Chief Justice of North Carolina Supreme Court is Cheri Beasley.
Q3
North Carolina embraces the perspective of gender diversity, and this dwells on the reasoning that more than 37% of women hold a position in the NC Supreme Court. Also, it is evident that three of the seven current Justices in the NC Supreme Court are women.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Q4
The NC Supreme Court is the highest court in the state and has no Jury.
Q5
The purpose of the NC Supreme Court is to offer a determination of the legal concerns raised in lower courts and to execute its primary function before administrative state agencies.
Q6
Understanding the routes of NC appeal of a case begin from the District Court of Magistrate that executes all categories of civil, juvenile, first-degree murder convictions and present all criminal cases for trial to the Superior Court. The Superior Court listens to appeals for administrative agencies and offers a determination of murder cases with guilty plea cases. The next is the Court of Appeals that offers a determination of the cases that involve utilities of commission and property tax commission, and then finally, the Supreme Court that offers a determination of legal and constitutional questions of a case that arises from the lower courts.
Q7
Given the evidentiary facts of the case of Rodney Nigee Pledger Taylor, who is identified as the defendant in his case against the state, it is quite imperative to note that the defendant was found guilty of first-degree murder by NC Supreme Court, and this affirms the foregoing reasoning that the trial court as the highest in the state committed no error. Also, the determination of the Fifth Amendment rights or Miranda rights of the defendant affirms that the trial court acted in the requisite capacity to erred in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the statements made during custodian interrogation (Kurshumova, 2016). Hence, it was reasonable for the defendant to be convicted of first-degree murder on the 20 th Day of June 2016.
Reference
Kurshumova, M. (2016). Taylor vs. State, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 27 (April. 21, 2016).
