On one side, the executive has too little power to properly govern the country as congress oversights most of its moves. The fact that congress is politically constituted implies that even the well-meaning proposals created by the executive could be short down. The situation, therefore, requires that the president gets a majority of representation in congress for most of his development agenda to get through. For instance, the suggestion to build a wall in the southern border has been met with resistance from a majority of congressmen (Hulse, 2019). The situation is further crippled by other powers of congress such as its investigative capability. In March, the House Judiciary Committee sent letters to 81 witnesses seeking information regarding abuse of power and obstruction of justice in the executive (Shaw, 2019). This situation implies that the president had little room to persuade various stakeholders to back up his plan without using the set channel of the legislative.
However, the executive can also wield too much power which is unhealthy for democracy. The scenario normally occurs when the president decides to overpass congress and institute projects without their input. Such a move implies that the voice of the people would have been overridden. For instance, the president has suggested using the 1976 National Emergency Act to declare the erection of the wall as a military construction (Nytimes.com, 2019). In such a case, the president will have opened room for using 123 statutes without going through congress. The best congress can do in such a circumstance is to reduce the timeframe for the emergency declaration. However, such a decision will not bear much fruit as the president would already have allocated resources to the required project. With such kind of a situation, it is evident that a president can thwart people’s wishes and instead promote projects that represent the interests of a minority.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Hulse, C. (2019, March 17). After Veto, Some Lawmakers See a New Emergency: Fixing the Act Trump Invoked. Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/16/us/politics/trump-veto-emergency-act.html
Nytimes.com. (2019, February 16). Opinion | A Trump-Made Emergency. Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/14/opinion/trump-national-emergency-border-wall.html
Shaw, K. (2019, March 7). Opinion | The White House and Congress Are Heading for a Collision. Who Will Win? Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/06/opinion/executive-privilege.html
