How Legislation with Such Negative Consequences for a Large Group of Citizens Can Be Prevented or Stopped
Legislation with such negative consequences for a large number of citizens can stop at three levels. The first level is stopping it before the bill passes, and the second level is stopping its implementation. The legislation can also stop affecting the citizens negatively after implementation. Before the bill passes in the Assembly, it is crucial to understand the necessary committees involved in approving it and mobilizing parties that will be affected negatively. For instance, in the case of North Carolina, as found by Milstead and Short (2017), the mobilization will be directed to eight groups of legislators. Examples include the house committee on finance, house committee on aging, house appropriation committee, among others. However, if the bill passes, the concerned legislators can, and the public can lobby against its implementation. As such, they will employ maneuvering tactics that include deflection of goals, diversion of resources, and dispassion of energies. Finally, if the bill passes and implemented, the general public can stop it at the third stage that involves providing feedback to legislators and engagement in political activism.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Where the N.C. General Assembly Went Wrong With A Policy Aimed At Gaining More Revenue From Taxpayers Using The Modified Flat Rate Taxation Models
According to Smith (2015), the main aim of N.C. general assembly tax reforms was to reduce the tax burden yet increase the tax base. However, as found by Milstead and Short (2017), the tax code overhaul resulted in an indiscriminate reduction of the tax burden. As such, it favored the rich, businesses, and those below the age of 65 years. During its implementation, the N.C. General Assembly was wrong to act discriminately on the lobby groups. The realtor and non-governmental organizations were successful in championing for the reversal of their tax exemptions repeal. However, the fiscal research staff knew about the increased tax burden on senior citizens, but. Therefore, as Tummers and Bekkers (2014) found, the ignorance to engage all the affected groups attracted political activism that initiated reforms.
References
Milstead, J., & Short, N. (2017). Health policy and politics (pp. 108-111). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Smith, A. (2015). North Carolina Tax Reform (2015 Edition) | J.D. Supra . J.D. Supra. Retrieved 5 March 2020, from https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/north-carolina-tax-reform-2015-edition-12729/ .
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2013). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review , 16 (4), 527-547. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
