Probability theory is an essential statistical tool for analyzing data. Probability measures the likelihood that a random event will occur (Soong, 2004). Probability is especially important because it predicts the frequency of specific events or a combination of events (Grinstead & Snell, 2012). The prediction power of probability helps to interpret complex situations for decision making.
The probability of an event occurring is equal to the ratio of the frequency of that event to the sum of all frequencies. All probabilities fall in the range between p (Soong, 2004). Probability of zero means that an event will not occur while a probability of one implies that we are sure that an event will occur (Soong, 2004). Therefore, higher probability means that an event has higher chances of occurring. The summed probability of mutually exclusive events is one. Mutually exclusive events refer to events that cannot co-occur, meaning that the probability of mutually exclusive events coinciding is zero (Grinstead & Snell, 2012). Similarly, the probability of mutually exclusive events occurring is equal to the sum of the individual probabilities. Expressed mathematically:
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Probability = Number of favorable events/ Sum of all events.
The probability of two mutually exclusive events A and B occurring is:
P (A or B) = P (A) + P (B) (Grinstead & Snell, 2012).
The probability of mutually exclusive events A and B occurring together is:
P (A and B) = 0 (Grinstead & Snell, 2012).
Table 1 : Probabilities of spending at Springdale
Springdale |
||||
Frequency | Probabilities | Cumulative Probabilities | ||
$200 or more |
1 |
5 |
5/150 = 0.03333 |
0.03333 |
$150–under $200 |
2 |
12 |
12/150 = 0.08000 |
0.11333 |
$100–under $150 |
3 |
3 |
3/150 = 0.02000 |
0.13333 |
$ 50–under $100 |
4 |
20 |
20/150 = 0.13333 |
0.26667 |
$ 25–under $50 |
5 |
29 |
29/150 = 0.19333 |
0.46000 |
$ 15–under $25 |
6 |
38 |
38/150 = 0.25333 |
0.71333 |
less than $15 |
7 |
43 |
43/150 = 0.28667 |
1.00000 |
Total |
150 |
1.00000 |
The probabilities of respondents spending different categories of amounts are mutually exclusive, hence the cumulative total of one (Table 1). The probability for each category is obtained by dividing the individual frequencies by the sum of all frequencies. The probability that a respondent spends at least $15 during a trip to Springdale is the sum of probabilities of category $ 15–under $25 and above.
P (a respondent visiting Springdale would spend at least $15) = P ( $ 15–under $25 ) + P ( $ 25–under $50 ) + P ( $ 50–under $100 ) + P ( $100–under $150 ) + P ( $150–under $200 ) + P ( $200 or more)
P (a respondent would spend at least $15) = 0.71333 (Table 1).
Table 2 : Probabilities of spending at Down Town
Downtown |
||||
Frequency | Probabilities (Relative Frequencies) | Cumulative Probabilities | ||
$200 or more |
1 |
13 |
13/150 = 0.08667 |
0.08667 |
$150–under $200 |
2 |
6 |
6/150 = 0.04000 |
0.12667 |
$100–under $150 |
3 |
11 |
11/150 = 0.07333 |
0.20000 |
$ 50–under $100 |
4 |
6 |
6/150 = 0.04000 |
0.24000 |
$ 25–under $50 |
5 |
16 |
16/150 = 0.10667 |
0.34667 |
$ 15–under $25 |
6 |
32 |
32/150 = 0.21333 |
0.56000 |
less than $15 |
7 |
66 |
66/150 = 0.44000 |
1.00000 |
Total |
150 |
1.00000 |
P (a respondent visiting Downtown would spend at least $15) = P ( $ 15–under $25 ) + P ( $ 25–under $50 ) + P ( $ 50–under $100 ) + P ( $100–under $150 ) + P ( $150–under $200 ) + P ( $200 or more)
P (a respondent visiting Downtown would spend at least $15) = 0.56000 (Table 2).
Table 3 : Probabilities of spending at West Mall
West Mall |
||||
Frequency | Probabilities (Relative Frequencies) | Cumulative Probabilities | ||
$200 or more |
1 |
5 |
5/150 = 0.03333 |
0.03333 |
$150–under $200 |
2 |
12 |
12/150 = 0.08000 |
0.11333 |
$100–under $150 |
3 |
6 |
6/150 = 0.04000 |
0.15333 |
$ 50–under $100 |
4 |
11 |
11/150 = 0.07333 |
0.22667 |
$ 25–under $50 |
5 |
17 |
17/150 = 0.11333 |
0.34000 |
$ 15–under $25 |
6 |
29 |
29/150 = 0.19333 |
0.53333 |
less than $15 |
7 |
70 |
70/150 = 0.46667 |
1.00000 |
Total |
150 |
1.00000 |
P (a respondent visiting West Mall would spend at least $15) = P ( $ 15–under $25 ) + P ( $ 25–under $50 ) + P ( $ 50–under $100 ) + P ( $100–under $150 ) + P ( $150–under $200 ) + P ( $200 or more)
P (a respondent visiting West Mall would spend at least $15) = 0.53333 (Table 3).
Table 4 : Probabilities for Areas Highest Quality of Goods
The highest quality of Goods | Frequency | Probabilities | |
Springdale Mall |
1 |
79 |
79/150 =0.52667 |
Downtown |
2 |
38 |
38/150 =0.25333 |
West Mall |
3 |
11 |
11/150 = 0.07333 |
No Opinion |
4 |
22 |
22/150 =0.14667 |
Total |
150 |
1.00000 |
The probability that a specific shopping area has the highest-quality goods is the frequency of the particular shopping area divided by the sum of frequencies (Table 4). The brand with the highest probability is perceived as providing the highest quality products and has the highest capacity to attract customers. As shown in (Table 4), Springdale has the highest probability, followed by Downtown, while West Mall has the least. Arranging the brands in descending order, Springdale is the strongest in quality, followed by Downtown, and West Mall is the weakest.
Table 5 : Probabilities for Gender
RESPGEND |
||||
Gender | RESPGEND | Frequency | Probabilities | Cumulative Probabilities |
Male |
1 |
64 |
0.42667 |
0.42667 |
Female |
2 |
86 |
0.57333 |
1.00000 |
Total |
150 |
We use independent probabilities to analyze unrelated events. Two events A and B occurring together are said to be independent if the probability of event A does not affect the probability of event B (Soong, 2004). Gender of a respondent and spending at least $15 at either of the shopping areas are independent. The probability of two independent events occurring together is equal to the product of the individual probabilities. Mathematically, this expressed as:
P (A and B) = P (A) * P (B) if A and B are independent events (Soong, 2004)
Table 6 : Probabilities for Spending At Least $15 Given Specific Gender
P ( a respondent will spend at least $15) | P (a respondent is Male) | P( a respondent is Female) | P (spends at least $15 and is female) = P( at least $15) * P (female) | P(spends at least $15/male) = P( at least $15) * P (male) | |
Springdale |
0.71333 |
0.42667 |
0.57333 |
0.40898 |
0.30435 |
Downtown |
0.56000 |
0.42667 |
0.57333 |
0.32107 |
0.23893 |
West Mall |
0.53333 |
0.42667 |
0.57333 |
0.30578 |
0.22756 |
The probabilities of spending at least $15 and being a male or female are calculated by multiplying the individual probabilities (Table 5). Female respondents are more likely to spend at least $15 during their visit to Springdale, Down Town, and West Mall compared to the male respondents. This is because the probability that a respondent is female is higher. Female respondents are more likely to spend at least $15 while shopping at Springdale, followed by Down Town, and are least likely to spend at least $15 at West Mall. Similarly, male respondents are more likely to spend at least $15 while shopping at Springdale, followed by Down Town and are least likely to spend at least $15 at West Mall.
In conclusion, respondents are more likely to spend at least $15 during their visit to Springdale, Downtown, and West Mall, respectively. Respondents consider Springdale as having the highest quality followed by Downtown and West Mall, respectively. Females are more likely to spend at least $15 at any of the shopping areas.
References
Grinstead, C. M., & Snell, J. L. (2012). Introduction to probability. American Mathematical Soc.
Soong, T. T. (2004). Fundamentals of probability and statistics for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.