As a social worker one might use the Kubler-Ross grieving model in his service to families in a hospice environment. According to Kubler-Ross, the five stages of healing process are denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance (Smit, 2015). The first stage of grief is denial. In this phase, the universe becomes overwhelming and empty. Persons trust the diagnosis is in some way wrong, and hold on to a false, desirable reality. Denial helps people to manage and make survival conceivable. As a person embraces the truth of loss and begins to ask himself queries, he is unknowingly starting healing process. The second stage of grieving is anger, which is a necessary phase of healing process. Once a person identifies that denial can’t carry on, he becomes angry, particularly at close people. Some mental responses of an individual going through this stage will be: "Why me?"; “Where is God during this?”; "Who is the person to be blamed?” Although it might appear infinite, a person should be ready to feel the anger (McAlearney et al ., 2015). The more a person really feels the anger, the more it might start to go away and the more he/she will heal.
The 3 rd phase of grieving is bargaining, which entails the hope that the person may evade a source of grief. Normally, the bargain for a prolonged life is made in return for an improved way of life. Individuals experiencing less severe trauma may negotiate or pursue compromise. For example: "I would give whatever thing to have my loved one back." Following a loss, negotiating can take the kind of a momentary truce, and people become lost in confusion of statements such as “What if…” or “If only…” people want life to go back to what it was, and they want their loved one returned. The fourth stage is depression. After bargaining, individual’s attention shifts straight into present. Feelings of empty show themselves and sorrow enters people’s lives on a profound level. Individuals withdraw from life. A person confronts the unavoidability and realism of the loss as well as his individual defenselessness to alter it. Throughout this stage, grieving individuals can cry, undergo loss of sleep or change in eating habit. Individuals can also fault themselves for having triggered or somehow added to their loss. People then enter a final, stage of acceptance , in which they have managed their early grief feelings, are capable of accepting that the damage has happened and can’t be reversed, and they are capable of planning for their futures and re-participate in everyday life once again (McAlearney et al., 2015).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
One component or rather a stage of the grieving model at which a social worker will find it difficult to apply Kubler-Ross grieving model in social work practice is anger. This is because in this phase, individual’s life seems to be shattered and there seem nothing concrete to hang onto. People feel abandoned in a grief occurrence (Boerner et. al ., 2015). People think that they are alone in the earth. It becomes very challenging for the counselor to convince them otherwise.
While they would positively counsel their clients, social workers often disregard to counsel themselves regarding self-care or pay attention to the signs of the risks linked to their specialized practices. The price of such self-neglect is very high, and the necessity to get involved in self-care is great. The first strategy is to heal, which is the least of self-care and inspires a person to concentrate on gaining what he/she require to survive. The 2 nd strategy is to energize, which is extra advanced self-care and inspires a person to concentrate on thriving. What is more important is that peace and healing necessitate an individual’s fundamental mental, emotional, and physical requirements to be met, which is not simply a matter of gaining adequate sleep, healthy food, and passable exercise, although those are essential. It is similarly depending on trustworthy individuals for support, heeding when the body signals to decelerate and pay attention to it, and not forcing oneself to the breakdown point (McAlearney et. al ., 2015) .
References
Smit, C. (2015). Theories and models of grief: Applications to professional practice. Whitireia Nursing & Health Journal , (22), 33.
McAlearney, A. S., Hefner, J. L., Sieck, C. J., & Huerta, T. R. (2015). The journey through grief: insights from a qualitative study of electronic health record implementation. Health services research , 50 (2), 462-488.
Boerner, K., Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Wortman, C. B. (2015). Theories of grief and bereavement. Encyclopedia of geropsychology , 1-10.
