Collaboration often takes place within a nested setting where the parties involved belong to a collaborative initiative and to the organization that is also part of the initiative. The initiatives often grow and develop within a predictable cycle. In addition to this, it tends to be integrated and formalized on a continuum that ranges from slightly blended and informal to very integrated and formalized organization. The range further will vary based on the complexity of the problem that they are addressing. The initiatives involve forming teams that dialogue, make decisions and take action on, and evaluate the outcomes of their actions (University of Maryland, 2000). A collaborative initiative emphasizes the need for working together as a team to achieve a particular task. Through a cooperative initiate, there are many positive aspects such as leveraging resources, reducing possibilities of duplication of efforts, in addition to improved effectiveness and efficiency. Other studies have shown that collaborative initiative often encourages cross-fertilization of ideas which will then result in innovation and new solutions to the current complex problem.
The Promising Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence seem to be less essential to the initiative. Currently, the US with about 5% of the entire global population has approximately 35-50% of the civilians owning a gun as shown by a report conducted in the year 2007 by Small Arms Survey. The United States has further been reported to have the highest rates of homicides rate committed using a gun throughout the advanced global economies. A firearm control Act of the year 19678 prevents the sale of guns to particular groups of people, among them including, mentally ill, individuals with the criminal record, people below 18 years and unlawful aliens. Based on this, it is clear that the contribution by the partner is less essential to this initiative because it has continued to be a major issue, and besides, also difficult to address adequately. Over the years, the tightening of gun control laws has not been effective in reducing the number of people killed or injured by gunshots in the United States (Shay, 1999). Contrary to the expectation of many, the number of victims of gunfire is increasing at an alarming rate, with the majority of them being innocent. This situation can only be reversed if the gun control laws are revised and tightened further to curb the increasing number of mass shootings and other gunfire-related deaths and injuries taking place in the country, which has compromised the health and safety of the masses. It is, therefore, necessary for the federal government, state and local governments, and other important stakeholders, to introduce and carry out more strict measures to regulate gun ownership and use in the United States. It will minimize the ever-increasing number of deaths resulting from gunshots, thereby improving the health and safety of all the United States inhabitants. If gun ownership and use are not controlled, more people will continue to suffer and die due to injuries inflicted by gunshots, thus making the country quite unsafe for all its inhabitants and visiting foreigners. An individual willing to acquire a gun or any legal firearm within the statute must, therefore, be allowed to obtain a standardized psychological assessment that should only be provided by a licensed doctoral level mental health specialist.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
One of the criminal justice entities that I believe could enhance the success of the initiative is the community correction. Community corrections are the penalties imposed on convicted criminals that take place outside the prison or jail. Community correction can be considered as community-based programs or even sentencing options that are often reserved for all the non-violent and all the first time offenders. Focusing on community correction, the judge will have the different option at his or her disposal (Champion, 2002). Some of the community correction that a magistrate might adopt is house arrest where an offender will be required to remain in their homes, and this will be accompanied with few exceptions including work, returning to court and even religious services. They involve disciplining offenders and criminals in their community or within their household. Community corrections act as an alternative to imprisonment, or the court may give this offer to the convicted people as a condition to their release. This type of corrections requires the offender to attend a rehabilitation program, visit a community correction facility regularly or provide unpaid community services. Community corrections help in reforming criminals by punishing them for their wrongdoing (Champion, 2002). This method of correcting offenders is exercised by the court of law or agencies mandated with this task. Community corrections have been used as an alternative to incarceration for low- risk offenders. As a means of correction, community correction has yielded much better results than taking criminals behind bars. Community correction is an effective solution to address issues related to jails and prison overcrowding. On the other hand, there is the need for the community corrections to have a deeper follow through. It is important to ensure that offenders who are the community corrections to attend certain mandatory classes that will equip them with certain critical skills that might help them when they are released from prisons.
Many Non-criminal entities could be used to enhance the success of the initiative. In combating juvenile delinquency, several elements can be adopted. These programs have been put in place in the community to reduce criminal behavior among youths. One of the programs in place is the Pace Center for Girls, and this specifically offers non-residential criminal behavior deterrence program. The program targets exclusively the needs of the young females of ages between 12 to 18 identified as dependent, malingerer, fugitive, aberrant, or even those in need of academic skills ( Pacecenter.org , 2017). The program’s goal is to offer the young females with fostering and conducive surroundings and aid them by reducing the rates of dropping from schools, adolescent law-breaking, teenage pregnancy and drug misuse. The other program is PACE Youth Programs, Inc. established to enhance the at-risk youth’s lives, refurbish family bond, and stop youth incarceration. Further, it provides the teens with specific services for instance “academic education, life management curriculum that is gender-specific, parental involvement and even therapeutic support services. The moment the girls complete this program the organization further continues to closely monitor their educational and personal growth in a three year period of follow-up case management. The program also has been shown to utilize a holistic model that are receptive to girl’s necessities to sustain them as they switch from PACE to the real word of education and career.
Based on this analysis, it is clear that collaboration initiative is critical to achieving a given course of action. When efforts are brought together, then it will follow that resources available would be utilized efficiently and each department will contribute significantly by managing a particular area where they are best at. From the case, the Promising Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence seem to be less significant to the initiative because this is a very sensitive area that requires utmost care hence should be approached strategically. However, for years it has failed to bring about the positive outcome. The essay has also identified both non-criminal and criminal agencies that would help make the initiate more successful.
References
Champion, D. J. (2002). Probation, parole, and community corrections . Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Pacecenter.org . (2017). Home . Retrieved 10 February 2017, from http://www.pacecenter.org/
Shay B. (1999). Promising Strategies To Reduce Gun Violence . Baltimore's Comprehensive Communities . Retrieved from: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/html/cd_rom/solution_gang_crime/pubs/Promisi ngStrat egiestoReduceGunViolence.pdf
University of Maryland (2000). Maryland Research in Brief HotSpot Communities Initiative Phase I. Center for Substance Abuse Research (CESAR). Retrieved from http://www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/pubs/20010801.pdf
