I agree with that statement. Different states have put varying delays on the number of days that a woman should wait between the time she makes a decision to abort and the actual day that she receives legal abortion service. According to Khazan (2015), Florida has a 24- hour restriction, Tennessee has a two-day restriction, while Oklahoma has a 72- hour delay. However, the waiting period should not be long to put the life of a woman at risk, but it should create more time for women to reconsider their choices. During this period, women can receive counselling on the procedure and the possible consequences of an abortion. For example, it allows them to understand the medical risks involved like death. Hence, it helps them to intensely analyze their situation before deciding an abortion since abortion is a decision that cannot be taken back. In this regard, counselling helps them to explore other options like adoption. Hence, reasonable restrictions or waiting periods help in rational decision making.
Moreover, women should be allowed to determine what is reasonable. Varying standards like economic condition and the wellbeing makes people different. Moreover, women experience situations that are different from the next. Therefore, the government should not speak for women since it aims at discouraging abortions. State laws mandate health professionals to acquire consent in the case of an abortion. However, these laws may provide false information to lure women from aborting (Vanderwalker, 2012). In this case, truthful and helpful information should be provided to aid in safe and legal abortion. Hence, since women understand their situation better, they should be allowed to determine what is reasonable.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Khazan, O. (2015, May 26). The sneaky way Republicans are driving up the cost of abortions. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/05/waiting-periods-and-the-price-of-abortion/393962/
Vanderwalker, I. (2012). Abortion and informed consent: How biased counseling laws mandate violations of medical ethics. Mich. J. Gender & L. , 19 , 1.
