A Clinical Information System refers to a system used to manage information for its use in a patient critical environment like the Intensive Care Unit. The system works in such a manner that it gathers information from all running systems in the hospital and sends it into an electronically organized record for patients. This record enables clinicians to obtain information from the patients’ right from their bedside ( Farzandipur, 2016) . Generally, Clinical Information Systems have made medical processes in the Intensive Care Unit easier and more efficient. CIS has in overall made communication between numerous health professionals better by ensuring they access all information they need about patients in order to make better decisions. It has also simplified patients’ access to x-rays and scans whenever they need it. Above all it has encouraged improvement of quality healthcare and even better medical research. There are three main factors that have promoted and encouraged the adoption of Clinical Information Systems.
The first factor is technology acceptance. Present day, the development of technology has morphed into one of the key strategic elements in most organizations across all sectors running from education to health. This has happened so much so that the effects of numerous changes in the social, economic and political systems as a result of technology have been more widely felt in comparison to the technology itself. The health system itself could not be left behind. The ancient paper record keeping system required electronic back up as it proved to be slower and less efficient. In order to solve this problem and to match up to the already evolved systems in other sectors ( Garavand et al., 2016)
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The second factor is quality and efficiency. Many healthcare stake holders discovered that the use of Clinical Information Systems in various segments of the healthcare sectors specifically hospitals was likely to improve the quality of services they offered as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the output given by their staff. These efficiencies equally result in the reduction of some costs. Summarily, Clinical Information Systems ensure delivery of quality and effective services. Effective and efficient service delivery equally results in cost reduction( Litvak, Eugene & Long, 2000).
The third factor is type of technology. The main concern for this part is the accessibility and usability of this technology. After numerous experiments, researchers have tried and tested various Clinical Information Systems in a wide range of users. From the samples, they discovered that some systems were more easily accepted than others. Some users have continued to use the same form of technology over and over since their first installation while others switched up immediately there was a release for a new model, version or type that was more compatible with them. Among the factors that affect the usability are factors such as cost of running the system, use friendliness or generalist technology trends that sweep the healthcare system. What is however important to note is that where systems comply with professional codes and standards, then they are widely accepted and recommended. Where they are unapproved, then the market does not embrace them as such. Cost is also key. Where organizations or hospitals specifically can afford a Clinical Information management System then they will be on board with it. Where the system proves to be way above their budget, then, they do not embrace it (Ross et al., 2016).
In conclusion, from the three main factors pointed out above, there are several themes that cut across these factors. The social impact of CIS as a form of technology, its usefulness, and conditions for its facilitation, ease of use as well as attitudes and behaviors are elements central to the effective implementation or adoption of Clinical Information management systems.
References
Farzandipur, M. (2016). Factors affecting successful implementation of hospital information systems. Acta Informatica Medica , 24 (1), 51.
Garavand, A., Mohseni, M., Asadi, H., Etemadi, M., Moradi-Joo, M., & Moosavi, A. (2016). Factors influencing the adoption of health information technologies: a systematic review. Electronic physician , 8 (8), 2713.
Litvak, E., & Long, M. C. (2000). Cost and quality under managed care: Irreconcilable differences. Am J Manag Care , 6 (3), 305-12.
Ross, J., Stevenson, F., Lau, R., & Murray, E. (2016). Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implementation science , 11 (1), 146.
