This essay highlights the forensic pitfalls and issues involved with the abduction of investigation. The suspects involved were arrested, kept in captivity, interrogated and later executed. Their bodies were hidden and then disclosed to another stage to conceal evidence. It highlights the loss of proof and the crime scene's degradation ( Fortney et al., 2020) . The Mexican prosecutors who were granted to investigate the act were responsible for the kidnapping alongside their colleagues. They then did everything they could to conceal the facts and obstruct the investigation. This article, therefore, discloses how criminal justice is served.
Two special agents were kidnapped on 7 February 1985, Alfredo Zavala and Enrique Camarena. This happens to be one of the most successful and broad investigations. Rare forensic difficulties arose as an outcome, and several suspects were detained. The Mexican Federal Police is responsible for the research. Caro Quentro, one of the accused, tried to escape by private jet after giving a six-figure handout to the authorities.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Research at the beginning of February was unproductive. The investigators' colleagues were openly involved in the plan execution situation. They had received information that the fatalities were at Bravo Ranch ( Caseyet al, 2020) . Initially, in March, the prosecutors did as it was in the message. However, they were all murdered. Mixing up the remains left the stolen bodies unburied on the roadside. The investigation comes to an early conclusion after the prosecutors had received a bribe.
The FBI forensic squad has identified the remains. The forensic findings confirmed the victims' bodies. To prove this, additional FBI and DEA staff were deployed to locate where the victims were and realized that any evacuation had taken place ( Gonzalez et al, 2018) . Suspects are detained, and the FBI has moved to the house for further investigation. This is completed after Mexican detectives unknowingly clear all the facts on the site. The house is defined as the most reasonable residence for a prisoner to be held. At the FBI forensic unit's home, it was clear that several people had questioned and tortured SA Camarena. Hairs, fibers, and latent fingerprints were examined in all the rooms and bathrooms ( Ehikhamenor et al, 2017) . Plastic bags, a small truck, and a licensed plate; assets belonging to Mexican investigators can be found in the home. To conceal any other facts, Mexican detectives stopped further searching the site. Caro Quntero's associate is arrested and interviewed by Mexican detectives. He said the remains of two Americans kidnapped and murdered by Mexican drug dealers had been found on the La Primavera Park’s southern side. This show to be true when next taking the numerous soil samples of the site and the victims' bodies.
The author outlines that drug traffickers were incarcerated and detained as the principal suspects during Camarena's ordeal. This came later as meticulous testing of hair and fingerprint samples. The FBI forensic team analyzed the evidence seized by 881 Lope De Vega's MFJP forensic team. The proof consisted of minor models taken from SA Camarena's burial sheet by the MFJP, a piece of cable used to tie SA Camarena, and a part of the pillowslip detached from the bedroom ( Berk et al., 2018). The paper reveals that Forensic research identifies 881 Lope De Vega, where the fatalities were being taken. It is a strong association between the two Mexican men. The comprehensive model of the residence is prepared and drawn up for the FBI Laboratory Trial.
Trial maps were also organized to clarify different forensic pieces of evidence. Nearly all the proof announced in this report has had a significant impact on the lawsuit's result. For example, the observer's vehicle on that specific day proved to be SA Camarena's abduction. This represents the FBI as the top inspection tool for law enforcement. If it was not for the FBI team to conduct various checks, such as fingerprints, soils, and other objects on the ground, the Mexican detectives might have destroyed the evidence. Though there were also various shortcomings in the article, the Mexican investigators hampered and halted numerous inquiries for any reasonable cause. It conducted talks with the US, which led to the cancellation of further research at home without clarification. According to the article, the charts are drawn also offered useful data to explain the complicated methods and characteristics used in the analysis of the fur, fibre cloth, and cordage evidence. Another drawback is that the FBI forensic unit did not have enough tools to investigate. On the sight of a crumpled license plate during the investigation, they had to go to a crowbar to draw Mexican officers to stop the examination.
Besides, the paper revealed a range of accuracy points to a great extent. In the report, different samples analyzed by the FBI forensic team were valid proof of misconduct. For example, soil samples were verified to show the optimal place where the fatalities were held. In total, the handling of cordage and funeral boards, rooms, and compound grounds gave the case in question correct findings ( Stogner et al., 2020) . The forensic drawbacks and the challenges in this situation are finally determined. On some occasions, unusual methods were engaged, and non-routine actions followed. The best of the facts presented in the courtroom has impacted the case scenario's outcome.
In conclusion, following a lengthy hearing involving multiple parties, the defendants are found guilty, convicted, and sentenced. Therefore it is evident that the article reveals how criminal justice to the suspects is served.
References
Berk et al. (2018). Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art. Sociological Methods & Research , 0049124118782533.
Casey, E., & Nikkel, B. (2020). Forensic analysis as iterative learning. The Security of Critical Infrastructures (pp. 177-192). Springer, Cham.
Curmi, T. (2021). Investigative Decision Making and Its Association With Critical Thinking Skills, Thinking Styles, and Law Enforcement Experience.
Ehikhamenor, E., & Chiwuike, U. K. (2017). Towards Developing and Establishing a Regulatory Guideline for Accreditation of Forensic Education in Nigeria. SM J Forensic Res Criminol , 1 (2), 1007.
Fortney et al. (2020). Cold case review & analysis: Constructivist learning in forensic science through collaboration with law enforcement agencies. The Journal of Forensic Science Education , 2 (2).
Gonzalez et al. (2018). Criminal justice system involvement among homeless adults. American Journal of Criminal Justice , 43 (2), 158-166.
Stogner et al. (2020). Police stress, mental health, and resiliency during the COVID-19 pandemic. American journal of criminal justice , 45 (4), 718-730.
