Making an arrest is not the same as making a conviction, and anyone can be falsely accused or wrongfully arrested. A criminal conviction goes way beyond making an arrest: it is a judicial ruling against the suspect accused of committing a crime. When arresting someone on suspicion of a crime, the officer takes the suspect into custody. Arrests are also made when a jury returns with a guilty verdict or when a warrant of arrest is issued against a person who is not in custody. When an arrest is made, the officers are obligated to follow the steps to ensure sufficient evidence is collected and protected to guarantee a successful conviction.
Charter laws accord the citizens the power to see that their freedoms and rights are not infringed or violated by governments and laws. Suppose a representative of the law or government, which in most cases means the police, violates the charter while arresting or detaining a suspect (Lundman, 2012). In that case, the courts can be asked to address these violations. Making arrests lawfully and within the law is a good way of guaranteeing a successful trial and conviction. These charter laws include their rights to be presumed innocent until proven guilty for the three suspected home invaders.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Proving that a suspect is guilty means building a solid case against them, backed by evidence and witnesses. During the eight months of the trial, the police and the prosecutors had the responsibility to ensure that no evidence is lost. For instance, for evidence to be admissible in court, it must be obtained legitimately without forced confessions or coercions (Peterson et al, 2010). Every piece of evidence should also be appropriately collected and labeled for admission in court. Convictions are often overturned because of lack of evidence, which necessitates the need to separately pack the evidence and carefully store it to minimize contamination. Evidence of a crime committed eight months before a conviction has to be stored in a manner that makes it possible to relive the crime scene, regardless of the time lapsed.
References
Lundman, R. (2012). Routine Police Arrest Practices: A Commonweal Perspective. Social Problems , 22 (1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1974.22.1.03a00100
Peterson, J., Sommers, I., Baskin, D., & Johnson, D. (2010). The role and impact of forensic evidence in the criminal justice process. National Institute of Justice , 1-151.
