The ideals, as well as the composition of individual conservatives, radicals, and liberals remain different, but these same belief systems work together in harmony with the sole purpose of making up the much-needed framework of a country’s political, social, religious, and economic thoughts. In essence, these competing worldviews on social welfare tend to share common goals when it comes to prosperity and other aspects of life, but they employ different approaches to achieving them. In politics, for instance, conservatives vote for issues that their liberal or radical counterparts will always disagree with.
The most interesting aspect of liberal, conservative, and radical perspectives involves their philosophical differences when it comes to their practical attitudes toward government systems. While liberals advocate the decentralization of power, conservatives want a centralized government system, which has the capacity to exercise a great deal of control over state, as well as local governments’ activities, especially actions they tend to disapprove of. Given the differing opinions regarding what constitutes government power, it is expected that individuals who hold these perspectives will always vote against and for certain issues or measures. For example, a liberal-minded person firmly believes that local municipalities and states advocate the popular course. As a result, they not only take politics seriously but also utilize political tools as vital instruments of progress, reform, and social welfare. In this sense, liberals fight for independent administrations and institutions and vote more democratic leaders into office.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
On the contrary, radicals firmly believe in the fundamentally antisocial aspect of the government, meaning that they place much emphasis on the elimination of the State. From the assigned readings, they do not achieve this through coups, but by the change-driven historical processes of enlightening, strengthening, and consolidating the desired economic organization. Unlike their liberal counterparts, it is evident that radicals have little to no interest in politics, meaning they view any given political reform projects and associated movements as visionary. According to a radical-minded citizen, partisan politics operates as an ill-intentioned mechanism used by elites to economically exploit the lower classes in society.
Concerning economics and associated elements, the practical differences witnessed among the liberal, the conservative, and the radical are as spacious as in their approach to the government system. According to liberals, a stable economic system can only be achieved and maintained through the democratization or socialization of industry. On the other hand, conservatives strongly believe that the government should play a pivotal role in regulating the market as opposed to supporting it. With this approach to economics, the conservative tends to align its goals with the capitalist system in which the control of the various means of production remains in the hands of the a few. Radicals take a critical approach to the positions held by liberals and conservatives, arguing that the inclusion of the government in economic activities is not only exploitative but also plays a leading role in creating and furthering capitalism.
Although the radical view tends to agree with the whole process of democratizing industry, they advocate an overhaul; given the fact monopoly values are more likely to devor a socialized industry. In the United States (U.S.), for instance, radicals firmly believe that the various economic and social problems that affect individual Americans result from the capitalist system. Some of these issues include the wastage of public resources, unemployment, and misdistribution of income, wealth, as well as power. Ultimately, it is evident that every school of thought and their respective followers have strong and widely held opinions about any of the social welfare issues in the present-day society.
