30 Sep 2022

104

Biotechnological scientists Herbert Boyer and Stan Cohen who deserve a prize

Format: APA

Academic level: University

Paper type: Research Paper

Words: 779

Pages: 3

Downloads: 0

Introduction 

Herbert Boyer and Stan Cohen have made great moves in the field of biotechnology. They combined in a great venture that made them both impactful and respected in their various fields. Using their great insight and their research, they were able to invent a method that cloned genetically engineered molecules in foreign cells. With Herbert Boyer in the forefront, they were able to engineer a multibillion- dollar industry. After meeting at a conference in Hawaii in 1972, they were able to combine their skills. Cohen had developed a way to introduce plasmids with antibiotic properties into some bacteria. He could also use the method to clone and isolate genes carried by the plasmids. Boyer on the other hand had managed to isolate an enzyme that could cut strings of DNA into cohesive and precise segments. Their expertise caused them both to receive awards. They are both deserving of the Carleton Prize for Biotechnology. 

Research and Body of Work 

Contribution of Herbert Boyer and Stan Cohen 

Stan Cohen and Herbert Boyer were able to launch a multibillion-dollar biotechnological industry that is still relevant today. In 1973, soon after they met, they quickly determined that they could add genes to a single cell from an organism. This caused the genes to replicate in the cell. The two of them together are responsible for the recombinant DNA (rDNA). Boyer and Cohen did not stop there. They moved on to complete cloning experiments that were more complicated. In their cloning experiments, they recognized the advantages of incorporating human genetic information into bacteria to replicate the body’s ability to fight disease and infection. 

It’s time to jumpstart your paper!

Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.

Get custom essay

Scientists had known for a long time that bacteria had extra loops of DNA (foundation, 1980) . Such loops were known as plasmids. Naturally, bacteria were able to swap these plasmids with each other. This allowed the transfer of beneficial genes that aided in antibiotic resistance. Herbert Boyer had the know- how on restriction endonucleases (cutting open the loops of plasmids). Cohen on the other hand had done extensive research on the plasmids and that is why they made such a great pair and decided to partner up. 

Recombinant DNA is considered a more significant achievement in molecular biology than that of Watson and Crick (1953) (Jones, 2015) . Joining forces with Robert Swanson, Boyer created Genentech, a biotechnology firm which has been responsible for great leaps in biotechnology. One of those leaps includes the genetical engineering of human insulin (Science History Institute, 2017) . Not limited to one achievement, Genentech Inc. is involved in more research including how to alter crops to help deal with global food shortages. 

Before Genentech, Boyer had succeeded in expressing mammalian protein in bacteria. They were able to do this at USCF at the City of Hope Medical Center in California (Science History Institute, 2017) . They noticed that the hormone, which was produced in the human brain was key in producing the growth hormone (Suliman Khan, 2016) . The recombinant somatostatin (Suliman Khan, 2016) acted no different from the naturally occurring substance. Cohen focused on academic research and consulted for Biotechnology Company but Boyer was more involved in commercial work. The two of them have paved way for plenty of research on recombinant DNA and made great contribution to improvements in biotechnology. 

Despite their major achievements, Cohen insisted that they had not sought to be the spark to the flame of a multi- billion-dollar idea (Huges, 2001) . He sa id that they just stumbled on genetical engineering as they were working towards understanding basic biological dilemmas. Such humility and thirst for knowledge makes them quite the pair and can also attribute to their success. It is also the reason why they are best suited to receive the Carleton Prize for Biotechnology. 

Cohen and Boyer are game changers in the biotechnological fields. Despite being able to come up with recombinant DNA, they have managed to revolutionize the biotechnology field. Toying around with their findings and involving themselves in deep research allowed them to birth a great field. They were able to revolutionize biotechnology and be the first to get a clean break in molecular biology. 

Conclusion 

The Cohen- Boyer collaboration must have been the best thing that happened to biotechnology. The two scientists are even considered by some as the ground- breakers for exciting work in molecular biology. The two scientists, especially Boyer are also very keen on the materialization of their work into a great company that has earned them plenty of money. That aside, the two have also received plenty of nominations and awards for their exemplary work. Quite by coincidence, as most things happen, this pair were able to revolutionize molecular biology. Their patenting (Jones, 2015) was able to bring them loyalties in 27 million dollars which is more than most scientists can claim. Because of their thirst for knowledge and the desire to pass it on, they both still teach in universities. Cohen even consults for biotechnological firms. This is why they should be awarded the Carleton Prize for Biotechnology. 

References 

foundation, A. a. (1980). Cloning genes by recombinant DNA technology. Albert and Mary Lasker foundation . Retrieved from http://www.laskerfoundation.org/awards/show/cloning-genes-by-recombinant-dna-technology/ 

Huges, S. S. (2001). Making Dollars Out of DNA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Jones, M. (2015). The Invention of Recombinant DNA Technology. LSF Magazine , 18. 

Science History Institute. (2017). Herbert W. Boyer and Stanley N. Cohen. Science History Institute , 4. Retrieved from https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/herbert-w-boyer-and-stanley-n-cohen 

Suliman Khan, M. W. (2016). Role of Recombinant DNA Technology to Improve Life. International Journal of Genomics . Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178364/ 

Illustration
Cite this page

Select style:

Reference

StudyBounty. (2023, September 14). Biotechnological scientists Herbert Boyer and Stan Cohen who deserve a prize.
https://studybounty.com/biotechnological-scientists-herbert-boyer-and-stan-cohen-who-deserve-a-prize-research-paper

illustration

Related essays

We post free essay examples for college on a regular basis. Stay in the know!

17 Sep 2023
Biology

How the heart pumps blood

How the heart pumps blood The heart is a fundamental organ in the human body as well as in the bodies of all other mammals. For the human being, the heart is found in the thoracic cavity, centrally located behind...

Words: 454

Pages: 1

Views: 390

17 Sep 2023
Biology

Effects of Wolf Predation on Elk Group Size

Ecological studies suggest that the restoration or the introduction of wolfs into areas with large numbers of elks have led to the decrease in the size of elk groups as well as their general size. Elks respond to...

Words: 1698

Pages: 6

Views: 397

17 Sep 2023
Biology

Strelitzia reginae: the structure and function of the three types of plant tissue

Introduction The three main plant tissue types include vascular, dermal and ground tissues. The dermis of the plants serves the same function as the dermis on the animals. Its main role is protection of the...

Words: 2351

Pages: 9

Views: 231

17 Sep 2023
Biology

Cystic Fibrosis, How it Affects the Respiratory System

Cystic Fibrosis, How it Affects the Respiratory System Introduction/Overview of the Respiratory System The human respiratory system is a crucial, yet extremely exposed system within the body. The exposure is based...

Words: 983

Pages: 3

Views: 183

17 Sep 2023
Biology

The role of the PH scale in the health of a person

The PH scale is numeric and always indicates the levels of hydrogen ions in a solution or a substance. It is used to ascertain the acidity or the basicity level of a substance. The level of acidity is always expected...

Words: 306

Pages: 1

Views: 142

17 Sep 2023
Biology

The analysis of the different organs injury: a case with two arrow wounds

The given scenario involves a patient that was brought to the Emergency Department and had two arrow wounds. The first arrow is on the left side and it entered anteriorly between the 7th and 8th ribs through a...

Words: 1596

Pages: 5

Views: 158

illustration

Running out of time?

Entrust your assignment to proficient writers and receive TOP-quality paper before the deadline is over.

Illustration