In the case of private messages, sergeant Quon’s right to privacy was violated by the Ontario police department when in their report of the audit they redacted the content of all the messages that Quon had sent while he was off duty. The police department was unjustified when they invaded his privacy by reading and exposing his personal text messages. The Ontario police department had not violated Quon’s rights to privacy because they depicted that it was stated that the use of city-owned equipment and communications through the city’s email server was subjected to auditing and all employees were expected to limit the use of equipment to work-related matters. Yes, I believe that the manner in which Quon misused the department pager should matter in determining the violation of his privacy. This is because he was already notified that the pagers were issued for message purposes of the city-electronic communication policy and that they were given to police officers when other means of communication were unavailable. As such, according to Kant’s theory, Quon actions did not consider the consequences but only sought to fulfill his duties.
Regarding ethical duties pretexting is perceived to violate the ethical duty of deontology which presents itself because the investigators used pretense to get information from the workers of the company. This was to confirm the person who had given extensive details of confidential information. Conversely, in this case, Kantian ethics is applied because Dunn and her investigator’s actions of using pretexting as a way of finding information does not depend on their results but only to ensure that they deliver their duty.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
ChoicePoint’s business models might differ from that of data aggregators that focus on gathering and using consumers online activities for marketing purposes because most of the information is drawn from records in government offices and courthouses. Personal information collected by ChoicePoint is more private than profiles of online behavior and purchases because they collect information that government agencies cannot access due to the laid down public sector privacy laws. ChoicePoint might protect its consumer’s information from unauthorized access by ensuring that they determine the credentials of the people working for them. Consequently, the consumer’s information can be secured by encrypting it using passwords and personal identification numbers that cannot be accessed by unauthorized individuals.
