Introduction
Many countries have been forced to a log head in a tough war which ends up reclaiming many lives as well as the destroying of properties. The outcome of war cannot be underestimated. It has a significant impact on the victim country’s economy as well as the country’s population. It is for this reason that the USA always engage in conflict resolutions in many countries in the world. However, their engagement has always been met by different reaction as asserted by Holsti (2012). Many governments always feel that they are independent hence capable of handling their affairs and hence should be left alone in case of war break up. Such governments are always resistance to any attempt of negation hence forces USA army to use force to save the civilians. Other governments are always ready to negotiate or involve in conflict resolutions strategies, and hence, mediation and conflict resolutions process are always the best. The debate on whether the USA should major on negations and mediation as conflict resolution has caught the interest of each person. This is what is displayed in the political cartoon (Mearsheimer, 2010).
Cartoon Description
The visual image and the words used in this cartoon are very significant. The cartoon shows two equal and opposite forces holding a gun. On one side is the arm representing the US while on the other side is another division representing other countries is which are at log head with the US government. The main issue in the cartoon is that the two have come at a balance point regarding war which is represented by the balance interlocked guns they are holding. To break it down, the artist has used words which suggest that being opposite and equal forces, the two should negotiate or dialogue to reach a mutual conclusion to avoid further war. Through the words which end with a questions mark, the two countries seem to have witnessed the effect of war on them and are both thinking of settling their differences through negation.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The weighty matter
The weighty matter in this cartoon is the conflict resolution among the countries which are at log head. The cartoon has presented one of the most powerful countries which always intervene in a situation where war is the order of the day. Two interlocked guns show that war has been ongoing until it has reached situations where the US and its enemies are at balance regarding war threat, and any more engagement may cause harm than good. Through the word art, an alternative solution to settle the difference is being hatched by both countries. The solution is conflict resolution through dialogue, talk and mediation.
Interdependent presentation of the cartoon
The artist has used both the visual image and word art purposely to clarify the argument and to make the theme of the art clear. Both the word art and the visual image depend on each other to convey this message. Without the picture, it would be worthless and challenging for one to comprehend what the topic to be talked about is. Alternatively, the image needed words for clarification for one to pick up the pieces of information and connect them to know what actual they are. For instance, without the word art, it would be difficult to come up with the theme of conflict resolution as an alternative solution to warring countries. The interdependence between the two art works is very critical in the cartoon art since they make it easy for the audience to formulate and comprehend the meaning.
Importance of image
Alternatively, the image used is very important. In the cartoon, there are many incidences omitted in the word art which are complimented in the visual image. The first incidence is the countries which are in conflict. The second issue omitted in the word art is the guns which represent the war. Lastly, the word art omits the interlocking guns which signify the balance power among the two conflicting nations. All these issues omitted are complimented by the image. The image has covered all the factors that have not been presented on art word to help make the art presentation meaningful.
A discussion of the critical analysis of the printed words
The meaning of this cartoon work is deduced from the implication of the artwork presented. For instance, the word “them” on the right hand implies other countries which are always at a log head with the US. The guns imply war; the interlocking guns implies the balance power and the questions mark implies an ongoing thought of talk as an alternative to war between the two countries.
The claims in words are apparent in the word art. From the image, it seems that the countries have fought the USA until it has reached a point where more fighting achieve little between them. Also, it seems like they have reached a situation where they are equally balanced, and there is no more interest in fighting each other. So when the words suggest “talk” as an alternative solution, this claim is very apparent. The evidence which is given in the image to support this claims on the word art are very relevant and warranted. Without these evident, it would be difficult to understand this cartoon art. From the interlocking guns, war cannot be a solution to these countries and the USA. Another alternative to bringing them other should be searched for. One of these alternatives is talking (Snyder & Diesing, 2015).
A discussion of the critical analysis of the imagery used
The intended audience for this cartoon imagery is the countries which are always on the neck of the USA and have failed to integrate talk with the country as a way to reach a peaceful reconciliation. Alternatively, the cartoon target USA and pledge for talk as they are looking for ways to bring peace in conflicting nations. The primary goal of the art is conflicting resolution through enhancing negotiation. The image is not misleading. It has been presented in the best way possible to present the interest concerned. Two arts a work are passive in the cartoon. The first one is the interlocking guns, and the last one is the questions mark at the end of word art (Deutsch et al., 2011).
A discussion of the persuasiveness
The piece is very persuasive; the use of the interlocking guns shows the level of the conflict that has occurred between the countries. To appeal for the alternative solution, the artist has used questions mark to show that though shared between the two nations in a persuasive manner.
Conclusion
Conflict resolution is very paramount among the conflicting country. The effect of war cannot be underestimated. For this reason, another alternative such as conflict resolution through talk is essential. This is what the cartoon artwork seems to be suggesting.
References
Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice . John Wiley & Sons.
Holsti, O. R. (2012). A widening gap between the US military and civilian society? Some evidence, 1976-96.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2010). The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics , 3 (4), 381-396.
Snyder, G. H., & Diesing, P. (2015). Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision making, and system structure in international crises . Princeton University Press.
