The veterans are important members of the society whose interest should be a priority for both the governmental and non-governmental organizations. The US has been involved in various fights to bring peace and stability in regions that are war-ravaged ( Dillon et al., 2017 ). Despite the obvious challenges that army service members encounter in the combats, they fearlessly defend the nation and demonstrate the highest level of patriotism any citizen can pledge to the country. Unfortunately, the veterans have faced a myriad of challenges upon returning home due to Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder (PSTD). The number of service members committing suicide or engaging in criminal activities that malign their name and reputation is shocking judging from the latest statistics ( Mash et al., 2018 ). The only plausible conclusion to the fate of veterans is the lack of adequate supports. For the veterans to fit in the society and lead normal and healthy lives, all stakeholders must take a collaborative approach and partnership ( Gray, De Boehm., Farnsworth, & Wolf, 2010 ). This way, all the programs that are established to rehabilitate the veterans suffering from PSTD will achieve the desired goals and objectives.
Formation of collaborations and partnership is critical in the program. The name of the coalition that will take part in the program is titled “Community for Veterans.” The name is chosen specifically to communicate with the people and other audiences the goals of the program. The community where veterans live encompasses people from different racial, religious, and socioeconomic backgrounds. The American veterans have diverse origins. As such, when forming the coalition, the issue of inclusivity is paramount. Inclusivity aims at debunking the notion that the American society is ingrained in racial undertones where the minority population is given limited opportunities in comparison to the majority population ( Kiosses, Karathanos, & Tatsioni, 2016 ). Therefore, in choosing the coalition members, all aspects of societal equalities including gender, race, religious affiliation, and socioeconomic background will be considered.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The organization that will be incorporated in the coalition is a non-governmental organization that focuses on veteran affairs. With constant debates on the number of veterans facing unprecedented challenges upon return from work, many community-based organizations have been formed to deal with the welfare of the veterans ( Marshall & Altpeter, 2015 ). Whereas some NGOs focus on one aspect of veteran affairs, others are comprehensive to cover all aspects. However, due to the limitation of resources, the NGOs have achieved little success in their goals ( Kiosses, Karathanos, & Tatsioni, 2016 ). As such, the collaboration with the NGOs provides the coalition with a benchmark for improving organizational efficiency and productivity. The already established NGO’s can offer insightful information that will improve the procedures and the process of the program. The partnership can also include sharing of resources for the best interests of the veterans.
The second organization that is instrumental in the coalition is the business community. Running the program requires sufficient funds. Sourcing for funds may be a challenge considering the program has a budget that has to be met. Failure to fix the budget deficit may plunge the program into a state of non-function ( Marshall & Altpeter, 2015 ). The resultant effect of such event is premature termination of the program. Collaboration with the business community can solve the financial problems that the program may face in future. The sustainability of the program depends on the availability of funds. The business community can form a strong and robust group that can raise funds for the program. This partnership is beneficial for the business directly. The partnership with the business community enhances the corporate social responsibility (Schwartz, 2017). The business will likely improve their public image, a factor that is critical for it to remain viable. Studies show that consumers are becoming more inclined to work with businesses that are actively engaged in supporting community projects and initiatives (Schwartz, 2017).
The third members of the coalition will be the community representatives or leaders. The program has been designed to help the veterans who are living in the community. For any program to work, it must have the support and blessing of the residents. The coalition is limited to five collaborating organization. The residents can have their input in the program through their leaders or representatives. The inclusion of the leaders or community representatives is premised on the valuable ideas the residents may want regarding the program (Amado, Stancliffe, McCarron, & McCallion, 2013). Because the veterans originate from the community, the residents have a greater say and involvement in the running of the program. Such implies that the efficacy of the program can be judged from the community perception. The perception can be changed if the residents have direct input in the running of the program.
The fourth group who play an important role in the program is the political resources. The political resources include collaborating with the political players. The political processes determine the rules and regulations that govern the society. As such, for the program to work effectively, the political resources that are available in the community should support it. The organization can petition the political players in the community to formulate regulations that will support the activities and programs of the initiative.
The last organization will be included in the coalition is the religious groups. The religious groups have been involved greatly in community affairs (Richards & Bergin, 2014). In dealing with veterans, the religious organization can be part of the remediation solutions. Religious teaching and nourishment is another way of alleviating stress for some people (McLaughlin, McLaughlin, & Van, 2010). Such implies that when a veteran may exhibit non-response to scientifically certified psychiatric solutions, other alternatives may be explored. Both the approaches are aimed at reducing the number of suicides and related events that are attributed to PSTD among the veterans.
References
Amado, A. N., Stancliffe, R. J., McCarron, M., & McCallion, P. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and developmental disabilities , 51 (5), 360-375.
Dillon, K. H., Crawford, E. F., Kudler, H., Straits-Troster, K. A., Elbogen, E. B., & Calhoun, P. S. (2017). An Investigation of Treatment Engagement among Iraq/Afghanistan Era Veterans with Problematic Anger. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 205 (2), 119.
Gray, N., De Boehm, C. O., Farnsworth, A., & Wolf, D. (2010). Integration of creative expression into community-based participatory research and health promotion with Native Americans. Family & community health , 33 (3).
Kiosses, V. N., Karathanos, V. T., & Tatsioni, A. (2016). Empathy promoting interventions for health professionals: a systematic review of RCTs. Journal of Compassionate Health Care , 3 (1).
Marshall, V. W., & Altpeter, M. (2015). Cultivating social work leadership in health promotionand ageing: Strategies for active ageing interventions. Health & Social Work , 30 (2), 135- 144.
Mash, H. B. H., Naifeh, J. A., Fullerton, C. S., Morganstein, J. C., & Ursano, R. J. (2018). Suicidal Behaviors in Military and Veteran Populations: Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention and Intervention. In Military and Veteran Mental Health (pp. 401-419). Springer, New York, NY..
McLaughlin, S. S., McLaughlin, A. D., & Van, J. S. (2010). Faith and religious beliefs in an outpatient military population. Southern medical journal , 103 (6), 527-531.
Richards, P., & Bergin, A. E. (2014). Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity . American Psychological Association.
Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility . Routledge.
