Q 1
First and foremost, Tom and the Committee have to keep abreast with the new ordinance plan in force. During the meeting, they have to scrutinize every single detail. Comprehension of the ordinance instituted will ensure that they can evaluate all available options including seeking to oppose the proposed incentive. The new directive appears to infringe on the privacy of Tom`s planning process since it is now possible that competitors will be well aware of what the institution is planning and worse still, this is contingent on the society`s approval. Tom and his committee should, therefore, seek to contest the proposed initiative by seeking periodic revision ( Silver, 2016 ). This may succeed and in the event it does not, they can seek to harmonize their thoughts with those of the community groups in a bid to make them understand how detrimental this situation is to them.
Q 2
Yes, it is imperative that Tom investigates the legality of a city ordinance that dictates the planning process of a state-operated institution. This is essential since it will establish whether Tom and his team will manage to attain the change that they are seeking ( Yen, 2016 ). Besides, it also becomes possible to determine the possibility of modifying any form of unwanted change. For example, they consider the State and federal laws alluding to the ordinance being sanctioned ( Silver, 2016 ). Moreover, it is possible that taking the matter to court and posing a logical argument might lead the judiciary to consider if the moratorium progresses a legitimate interest for the government seeking to institute the ordinance ( Silver, 2016 ). Likewise, it might also be possible that the ordinance is not being made in good faith in which case it can be dismissed.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Q 3
Prior to making a conclusion on the matter, Tom ought to have first sought the nature of relationship between the WUMC and the community members. For example, it is important to first consider the level of association between the two and whether conflict has ever ensued before. Another critical step would have been to determine whether there were employees at the hospital who belong to any of the community organizations that the institution is required to consult prior to coming up with proposed plans based on the ordinance put in place. That way, if there is a large number of individuals who are active members in such groups, it can be easy to negotiate the proposed ordinance.
Q4
It would be impossible for Tom to achieve competitive advantage for the organization if the entire city, and competitors are aware of the facility`s requirements to support the strategic plan. Tom has, therefore, to contest the ordinance or seek to express his grievances to the community groups responsible. Also, in order to counter intelligence in an environment where major planning decisions made are public knowledge, Tom can seek to have some members belonging to the five community organizations join his team so that they can be aware of any plans being made and ensure that they maintain confidentiality. Besides, it is possible to fight the ordinance in court if Tom can prove that it is unjustifiable to the organization. Likewise, in order to arrive at a consensus for the plan with such divergent interests existing in the process, it might be imperative to solicit the services of an arbitrator to resolve the conflict between both groups.
References
Silver, C. (2016). Zoning in 20th-Century American Cities. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History .
Yen, A. C. (2016). The Challenges of Following Good Advice about Copyright and the First Amendment. Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. , 15 , 413.
