Throughout the world, empires have risen and fallen, shaping the history of people and the type of rule established in different communities. The empires impacted their rules on the communities they conquered. The kings and emperors became leaders, establishing the administrative and military needs and uniting the people they conquered together. The rise of most empires as prompted by the capability of military forces, which helped to expand to different territories conquering the weak and ruling them over. The fall of historical empires as contributed by people rebelling against the harsh rules introduced by the emperors. The rise and fall of British, Mongolian, and Roman Empires have some notable similarities and differences as shown in the work below.
Similarities in the Rise of British, Mongolian, and Roman Empires
The rise of the British, Mongolian, and Roman Empires was mainly due to conquests. The empires targeted neighboring territories and used force and violence to take over the land and made people in those regions their slaves. In the case of Britain, for example, the Britain empire attacked and fought with France and was able to annex some of their regions. The dynasties used indirect rules in some communities. The empire would implement their rules through local leaders, a strategy mostly used by the Roman armies in North Africa, Asia, and some parts of Europe (Craughwell, 2010). Such rules helped to avoid excessive use of force and made most communities comply. When the local communities did not comply during the conquest period, the empires used their military power for force conquests (Craughwell, 2010). Tolerance was another approach used in building the empires. It was aimed at tolerating the conquered people and allowing intermarriages among people in the empire to strengthen the regions. The local beliefs, such as religions were also allowed to avoid resistance.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Differences in the Rise of British, Mongolian, and Roman Empires
The method of expanding the empires were different. Britain colonized different parts of the world to expand their territory. The empire sent their people in different parts of the world, explored the region, gave feedback to Britain, and they would later invade and colonize the region. Britain used both forceful and peaceful methods to annex their territories Leeson, 2017). Mongolians used forceful raids to conquer their neighboring tribes. Roman empire used to offer peace treaties and trade deals and allowing some people from the conquered region to be Roman soldiers. Another notable difference is in the system of ruling. In the Roman empire, the emperorship was hereditary and was also based on the number of followers. There were assistant rulers to ensure that people were loyal to the emperor. In Mongolian, a king was the ruler and was assisted by his sons and people they trusted. British empire had a monarchy system, and they allowed elections to be done, thus had a democratic rule system.
Similarities in the Fall of Mongolian, Roman and British Empires
The leading contributor to the fall of the three empires was rebellion from the subjects who were after their freedom. The British Empire, for example, received a significant blow from India, and they were successful in fighting and gaining their independence back in 1952. It motivated other colonized regions in Africa, and they also started rebelling. It was the same for Roman and Mongolians who went through revolutions and internal feuds, and that motivated the slaves to fight for their freedom (Southern, 2015). The other similarity was the emergence of rivals who were powerful, affecting the success of the empires. The Mongolian empire, for example, was faced with the Manchu army, which was more trained and with sophisticated weapons and aimed at conquering the empire (Tellier, 2019). France threatened Britain by gaining interest in different territories in Africa. The Roman empire received blows from Goth, a barbarian tribe that wanted to take over the empire. It was hard for these empires to keep up with these attacks, and the attacks led to failure.
Differences in the Fall of Mongolian, Roman, and British Empires
The Mongolian empire fell completely. The British effects were still felt in the nations that were colonized. The Mongolian and Roman empires had high levels of civil wars and corruption, factors that led to failure. The development of the independence movement led to the failure of the British Empire. The Roman empire effects are still evident in European Renaissance.
British Empire Influence to Our Society Today
The British empire had large effects on contemporary society. British empire retained ties with the former colonies through Commonwealth. British introduced their systems in different parts of the world, such as the parliamentary system and education. To current days, former British colonies still use the systems that were introduced, including the rules and country boundaries made during the colonial period. British introduced the English language that is widely used in most parts of the world and considered as a national language (Turchin, 2018). The empire facilitated the spread of Christianity, a religion used in most parts of the world. British empire supported the development of infrastructure in various parts of the world, such as railways and roads, for instance, in India.
Conclusion
The British, Roman, and Mongolian empires are highly recognized. The rise of the dynasties had different effects on people, especially suffering to the people that were colonized. The use of force and treaties tied the local communities to colonizers and subjecting them to slavery as they had to serve their masters. However, these people started to rebel due to the harsh rule and formed groups, leading to rebellion and failure of the empires.
References
Craughwell, T. J. (2010). The Rise and Fall of the Second Largest Empire in History: How Genghis Khan's Mongols Almost Conquered the World . Fair Winds Press.
Leeson, P. T. (2017). Mark G. Hanna. Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740.
Southern, P. (2015). The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine . Routledge.
Tellier, L. N. (2019). The Two First Economy-Worlds: The Roman and Chinese Empires. In Urban World History (pp. 95-119). Springer, Cham.
Turchin, P. (2018). Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall (Vol. 26). Princeton University Press.
