On many occasions, judges are exposed to human misery and tragedies that can lead them to develop trauma, which can hinder their professionalism in making fair judgments. Unfortunately, a judge might not even recognize the level that the trauma affects them, and it leaves them with severe consequences. Compassion plays a significant role in the administration of justice. It provides the judge with an easier way of dealing with other people’s overwhelming emotions by the judge trying to understand the other party’s suffering. Compassion can enable a judge to try ad relieve the other person’s feelings. Through compassion, a judge can effectively resolve a case before the court by controlling their negative emotions. Compassion techniques enable judges to process issues, trauma, and pain more effectively. Still, it also helps the judges take affirmative steps in reducing the level of suffering of other people. Additionally, the act of compassion in judicial exercise increases the level of satisfaction that the public has with the legal systems.
The situation would be different if the judge dealt with the accused because they could not demonstrate high levels of emotions like the defendant. The defendant is in a state of emotional instability, making it hard for her to control her feelings before the court. In case it was the defendant, there are low chances that they could be as emotional as the accused, or either way, the defendant could control their emotions in a much better way, and the situation could not have led to the judge snapping. Emotional compassion is required for individuals who express heavy feelings before the court, and such emotions could even make it impossible for them to express their opinion fully. The accused has not undergone much emotional damage as the defendant ad the chances of a judge acting in the same way as with the defendant are minimal.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
