Introduction
One of the key questions that has contributed to notable debate has been on the existence of God, which has prompted different arguments that seek to explain and provide evidence that serves as proof that God indeed exists. The arguments presented seek to establish a clearly front through which to connect specific aspects associated with the universe as part of defining the existence of a Supreme Being, God. In that view, this report will seek to embark on an in-depth analysis of two main arguments that have been presented as evidence to support the existence of God, cosmological and teleological arguments.
Cosmological Argument
The cosmological argument, which reflects on natural theology, argues on the existence of God a posteriori that can be seen from the apparent order that is brought out in the universe (Holder, 2017). The argument focuses on facts revolving around change, motion, and contingency as a way of trying to explain the existence of God as a key part of the manner in which the universe functions. Specifically, the argument brings to floor the concept of the first cause argument that suggests that everything must have a cause for it exist in a specific manner. In this case, the first cause argument suggest that the existence of the universe must have been as a result of the cause associated with a Supreme Being, who is referred to as God (Holder, 2017). Plato and Aristotle, who were key philosophers that set forth the argument, believed in the fact that God’s existence can only be explained by the fact that God must exist to serve as the first cause that played a key role in the existence of the universe. That is an argument that is supported by the Bible, as in says that, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Genesis 1:1).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Teleological Argument
Teleological argument, on the other hand, seeks to explain the existence of God from the perspective that the universe ought to resulted from an intelligent creator as evidenced by the deliberate design associated with the natural world (Craig, 2018). Specifically, the argument beings from observations that have been made with regard to the purposiveness of nature to help supporting the position that there exists an intelligent designer. Philosophers that supported the teleological argument agreed with the position that every sophistication and deliberate detail, as has been brought out through the universe, is not by chance. Instead, the explicit level of design and time taken to create the universe points to the existence of an intelligent designer, who is able to create an elaborate plan that reflects on functionality of nature (Craig, 2018). Consequently, this is a position that allows for every person, in the universe, to appreciate the fact that God exists as a key part of the world.
Conclusion
When looking at the question on the existence of God, it is important to consider several key arguments that are likely to provide factual evidence to support His existence. In this report, the focus was on two key arguments, which are cosmological and teleological arguments. In the cosmological argument, the existence of God can be explained from two perspectives, which are the apparent order in the universe and the first cause argument. The teleological argument focuses more on the sophisticated and detailed design associated with the natural order of the universe to support the fact that indeed an intelligent designer exists, who is then referred to as God.
References
Craig, W. L. (2018). The teleological argument and the anthropic principle. The Logic of Rational Theism .
Holder, R. D. (2017). God, the multiverse, and everything: Modern cosmology and the argument from design . Routledge.
