Courts are placed with the responsibility of imposing sentences on convicted criminals. They are embedded with various alternatives when executing punishment on convicted offenders. The court administrators- prosecutors and judges work to ensure that appropriate punishment is determined and imposed to criminals to enhance justice in criminal cases. There are some factors considered while determining a suitable sentence for a crime. Provisions for fairness and protection of public are primary concerns of court administrators. The corrections and sentencing policies must be structured with objectives of preventing criminals’ continued and any other future criminal act. Federal state court approaches in imposing corrections and sentencing have been portrayed through traditional views which, lean on rehabilitation or incapacitation. There are current policies to trim down recidivism perception to evidence-based tactics that hold criminals responsible, are responsive to correction costs to reduce victimization and crime. The following are factors to consider when determining suitable correction and sentence for offenders.
Corrections and sentencing policies must exemplify fairness, proportionality, consistency and opportunity. Court administrators ought to create sentences that commensurate with damage caused effects on victims and community plus rehabilitative requirements of criminal (Blumberg, 2011). The courts should endeavor to balance goals of treating as criminals alike with permission of discretion to choose correctional options which, meet criminal’s needs and add to felony reduction. They may also consider if corrections and sentencing policies negatively affect citizens about their income, race, geographical location or gender as well as drug crimes (Blumberg, 2011). Review of strategies that impact long-term consequences of offender convictions comprising of employment and housing opportunities.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Court administrators must portray a precise and purposeful corrections and sentencing rationale. The criminal code must articulate the aim of sentencing and associated practices and policies ought to be logical, transparent and understandable to public and shareholders (McEwen, 2014). They should give agency mission of statements which, reflect on the objective of recidivism decline and projected balance of incapacitation, surveillance, victim restoration and rehabilitation. They ought to enhance collaboration amongst health, criminal justice and human services (McEwen, 2014). The administrators need to involve and educate public through the provision of accurate and meaningful messages on approaches and issues affecting court and society as a whole.
Court officials must ensure a continuum of corrections and sentencing options must be available, having prison space for more severe criminal and enough community programs to supervision and diversion of other criminals. This help to ensure assessment of criminal risk, assets and needs in aid to give suitable services, placement and requirements (Roleff, 2013). They should support investment decisions and administrations by enhancing coordinated inter-branch efforts amongst corrections departments, courts, local government agencies and the Federal state. Court administrators should provide clear strategies for any violations of society government. Consider remedies for administrative and the tribunals alternatives on technical violations and provide incentives for conformity with conditions and needs (Roleff, 2013). They also have to offer suitable levels of administration and services for all criminals as they go back to the community. Also court can permit incentives to prisoners who successful complete the prescribed programming, training and treatment.
Conclusion
The court aim is to reduce the crime rate and create a safe public. The administrators of the court should concert their effort to eradicate abusive substance that lies at core most of much criminal behaviors. The court can expand the number of nonviolent drug offenders who may be the court order to get substance abuse treatment, and this will assist break cycle of crime and drug use and establish our homes, streets, and communities safer. This will build the court of criminal justice strategies not only tough but also smart.
References
Blumberg, A. S. (2011). Criminal justice . Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
McEwen, J. T. (2014). National Assessment Program Survey of Criminal Justice Agencies in the United States, 1992-1994 . Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan [distributor.
Roleff, T. L. (2013). Criminal justice . San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
