A judiciary and legislature, which aim to safeguard the integrity and dignity of the court, judges, and lawmakers, should pay attention to ethical standards. Over the years, several legislators and judges have been on the wrong side of the law questioning the integrity of the two administrative bodies (Hays, 2003). The significance of judicial and legislative administration demands a systematic approach to its components. For instance, Federal judges should conform to the United States Code of conduct for Judges, which is a compilation of professional standards and rules established by the United States Judicial Conference (Martinez, 2017). It gives guidelines to judges on matters of judicial competence and accountability, judicial vigilance and neutrality, appropriate extrajudicial actions, and the prohibition of impropriety or rather its presence.
The development of an ethical culture in the judiciary and the legislature is motivated by individual efforts. Legislators and judges come to power with a personal collection of principles. They commit to public service and usually claim fairness, dignity, and patriotism. In addition to their principles, the Chamber's commitment should be to render integrity and nominate excellent representatives to do so (Bowman, 2017). To remain ethical, ethicists advise elected officers not to focus on legislation solely. Ethical standards involve moral expectations based on moral responsibilities and values. Laws create codes of conduct but are not associated with personal consciences. While ethics control from within an individual, laws can only coerce from the outside. Legislators and judges must recognize that moral choice and moral judgment are the primary grounds for ethical decisions. Statutes have a weakness in that they can only address moral choice. They fail to address moral dilemmas where one needs to depend on individual will and integrity. Therefore, as the government comes up with laws to sustain ethics, legislators and judges must uphold their moral judgment to create a more ethical environment in the judiciary and the legislature.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References.
Bowman III, F. O. (2017). First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor's Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Martinez, R. S. (2017). Federal Sentencing Policy: Role of the Judicial Conference of the United States and the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Fed. Probation, 81, 5.
Tom Hays. (2003, August 4). Judges on the wrong side of the law . CBS News - Breaking news, 24/7 live streaming news & top stories. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judges-on-wrong-side-of-the-law/
