1. Aggressive childhood behavior is one of the behavioral risk factors for substance use disorders. Students at the elementary school often express antidrug attitudes. They find it difficult to understand why people use drugs. In middle school, their attitude changes towards acceptance of the behavior. The acceptance places them at a high risk of using drugs. It is not true that every aggressive individual will engage in drugs (Banducci, Lejuez, & Koenen, 2014) . Also, no evidence supports the idea that there is a link between aggressive childhood behavior and drug use. The few studies that investigated this relationship did not consider that aggressive actions are often lower in youths when compared to adults who have more opportunity and time to engage in them (Mathias & & Dougherty, 2015).
Availability of drugs is one of the environmental risk factors. The availability of drugs in a community increases the chances of an individual becoming a drug addict because as children, they think that they can get the drugs much easily (Banducci, Lejuez, & Koenen, 2014) . No research has been conducted that shows the relationship between availability and drug use. You cannot assume that because drugs are readily available for phy sicians, they are drug addicts (Ali, Mutter, & Novak, 2017) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
2. The aggressive childhood behavior can be prevented through prevention programs for parents. The parents should be taught on the importance of improving their family communication skills and family management skills. The parents should also be educated about the importance of making their children understand drugs and their effects, and also monitoring them. The prevention programs can also be introduced in schools in order to enhance self-control, peer relationships, and social behaviors (Clark, Wilder, & Winstanley, 2014) . Regarding the availability of drugs, laws should be enforced that restricts the sale of drugs to teenagers and ensure that that the police department fully imple ments the law (Hasin, O'Malley, & Feng, 2015) .
3. Q1. Ms. Applebee should not consider the collaboration with the local microbrewery because it would be like she is supporting the actions of the company. The local microbrewery has a history of using advertisements targeting youths. The activities of the company are encouraging youths to use drugs which is unethical. The goals of the brewery are very different from her company’s goals. If she accepts the collaboration, the image of her company will be destroyed, and she will lose most of her customers because the customers will see the company as promoting drug use among the youths.
Q2. Ms. Applebee should also not consider accepting funds from the national brewery because the brewery is acting unethically by going against the prevention services. The prevention services have implemented effective programs and policies for reducing substance use among children and youths in the society. The national brewery does not care about the effects of the drugs among the youths. It will be contradicting if she accepts the funds because she would be considered as complying with a company that is against the protection services. She would also be considered as violating the ethical obligations to and ethical principles of community and society.
Q3. The first ethical condition is that drugs should not be sold to children and youths below 18 years. Brewing companies should understand that drugs in the hands of teenagers and children are life-changing (Murphy & Bloom, 2017) . Avoid producing ads that attract teenagers because it will encourage them to try taking drugs. The second condition is to raise awareness of the effects of drug addiction. Although alcohol companies are focused on selling their products, they should also express the dangers of excessive drinking, especially among the youths (Spasova & Gundasheva, 2017) . The third ethical condition is adherence to protection services. Alcohol companies should ensure that they do not sell their prod ucts to children and teenagers (Monseau, 2017) . These conditions will make it impossible for the collaboration or acceptance of the funding.
References
Ali, M. M., Mutter, R., & Novak, S. P. (2017). Prescription drug monitoring programs, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and heroin use: Evidence from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Addictive behaviors, 69 , 65-77.
Banducci, A. N., Lejuez, C. W., & Koenen, K. C. (2014). The impact of childhood abuse on inpatient substance users: Specific links with risky sex, aggression, and emotion dysregulation. Child abuse & neglect, 38(5). Substance abuse prevention: The intersection of science and practice , 928-938.
Clark, A. K., Wilder, C. M., & Winstanley, E. L. (2014). A systematic review of community opioid overdose prevention and naloxone distribution programs . Journal of addiction medicine, 8(3) , 153-163.
Hasin, D. S., O'Malley, P. M., & Feng, T. (2015). Medical marijuana laws and adolescent marijuana use in the USA from 1991 to 2014: results from annual, repeated cross-sectional surveys. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(7) , 601-608.
Mathias, C. W., & & Dougherty, D. M. (2015). Aggression as a predictor of early substance use initiation among youth with family histories of substance use disorders. Addictive disorders & their treatment, 14(4), 230. , 230.
Monseau, S. &. (2017). It Is Just a Game (of Jews vs. Nazi Beer Pong): A Case Study on Law, Ethics, and Social Media. J. Legal Stud. Educ., 34. 241.
Murphy, P. E., & Bloom, P. N. (2017). Ethical issues in social marketing. In Marketing the public sector (pp. 68-78). Routledge.
Spasova, L., & Gundasheva, Z. (2017). Impact of advertising alcohol and tabacco on the behavior of young generation . Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1) , 425-432.
