The world is becoming increasingly globalized. Companies, individuals, and even governments are recognizing the importance cultural competence when interacting with people or entities from different cultural inclinations. According to Earley and Mosakowski (2004), there are three components of cultural intelligence. The first component is cognitive CQ which involves the understanding and knowledge of different cultures. An individual or organization must ensure that it has carried out research on different cultures before interacting with them. The second is physical CQ, which is the ability to perform the different customs and practices of a foreign culture. The final component is emotional CQ. This is the belief to adapt when interacting with a new culture. A person can have high competence in one component and deficient in the rest. Therefore, it is important to balance to achieve true CQ strength.
Diagnosing CQ is an important step of ensuring that an individual has cultural competency. Considering that the modern society is becoming increasingly cosmopolitan, interaction with people from different cultural backgrounds is inevitable. Therefore, diagnosing my CQ has been an invaluable experience in preparing me to interact with and associate with people from different culture. For instance, my average score was 3.9 after I compiled my scores for the diagnosis. The score fell short of the set threshold of 4.5 points, which reflects true CQ strength, meaning that I need to make some improvements. Prior to the exercise, I was overconfident about my ability to interact with people from other cultures. However, the exercise was insightful in the sense that it exposed some of my shortcomings. As a result, I will focus my energy to improve these areas and ensure that I meet the threshold required to be considered to CQ compliant.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
