Triangulation is one of the evaluation criteria for a qualitative research design. This includes the use of multiple designs, sources of data, observation, and theories to understand deeply the area of study (Green, 2018). This criterion is used in qualitative research to make sure that the findings are comprehensive and well developed. The second method of evaluating the qualitative research design is the aspect of transferability. This is the extent to which a researcher can be transferred to other contexts (Green, 2018). Triangulation is tied to the epistemological assumption in such a way that it tries to investigate a phenomenon in multiple ways and explains the different ways of acquiring knowledge on a subject. On the other hand, it is linked to the ontological assumption because it operates on the assumption that social phenomenon is independent of other factors and investigates different theories to try and establish this fact (Green, 2018).
Transferability can be linked to the epistemological assumption because it looks at the research design if it can be used to investigate the different phenomenon and make multiple interoperations that will be applicable to more than one setting. Moreover, transferability as an evaluation criterion is linked to the ontological assumption as it tries to evaluate if social factors in a qualitative research are independent or linked to other factors (Green, 2018).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In a qualitative research, one of the ethical issues that may arise is strict adherence to the principle guidelines when dealing with a human population such as informed consent and data privacy (ReSearCher, 2017). This will affect the aspect of the transferability of data and participants may be cautious therefore leading to blind data collection. This will lead to the change of research design to be able to accommodate and improve research outcomes (ReSearCher, 2017).
The amenability of a research topic in the context of qualitative research will mean the extent to which a research topic goes hand in hand with the research approaches and the research design chosen (ReSearCher, 2017). This, in general, will be interpreted as how much a research topic will represent the actual research activities.
References
Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research . Sage.
ReSearCher, N. (2017). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse researcher , 21 (6), 34-38.
