Deviants often conform to social organizations that dictate the relationships between the deviant persons in the context of the pursuit of their deviant acts. These social organizations are fundamentally characterized by the structure of patterns of these relationships. Variations among these social organizations are reliant on the levels of sophistication which involve the purposiveness, coordination, and complexity. Narrowing down the elements of complexity discrepancies, organizations vary in the aspects of membership size, levels of stratification, and the specialization of the members in terms or organizational roles (Best & Luckenbill, 1980). Variations in the coordination of organizational roles include the manner and degree of formalization and enactment of codes, rules, and agreements which govern the members. The other variations among organizations are the strategy and objectiveness with inform them strive towards and achievement of their purposes ( Holt et al., 2018) . Sophistication increases with the increase in the levels of coordination, complexity, and purposiveness and therefore, organizations with higher levels of the three elements are more sophisticated. This paper will focus on different forms of deviant organization. Also, it provides an example of how John can move his way through from less organized to more organized deviant social organizations.
According to research, sophistication forms the blueprint which determines the identifiable ways in which deviants organize themselves into. Five forms of social organizations will be discussed, beginning with the least sophisticated. These are loners, colleagues, peers, mobs and formal organizations. These organizations are described as ideal types and by field studies on deviance conducted in the present-day United States. It should be acknowledged that there exist intra-organization and inter-organization variations among the deviant types. Description of the forms by ideal types takes into consideration the fact that the types of deviants in a social organization may have features not inherent to the organization form. This can best be identified by an in-depth evaluation of the typical features of each form. Deviants can be located between or on the five points of the continuum of organizational sophistication. The downside of this description is the overlooking of the complexities of social life ( Holt et al., 2018) . The description of the social, organizational forms by field studies delves into the various ways a deviant can be organized in different societies and at different times. References to specific field research support this description. The references incorporate familiar research into the description and do not necessarily imply that deviants invariably organise in a particular way.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Loners
Majority of loners operates as individuals., they do not want to associate themselves with the other deviants for the exchange of supplies, the performance of deviant activities, or purposes of sociability and information. Loners are supposed to supply themselves with ideology, equipment, skills, and knowledge which their deviance requires (Best & Luckenbill, 1980). Loners don’t have deviant associations, and they cannot accept critical types of feedback as moral support or information on how they performed, new opportunities or alteration in social control plans. Loners usually enter deviance as a defensive response to private trouble since their entry does not require contact with other deviant, given that they could socialize themselves, loners regularly originate from a population that is less probably to be involved in more complicated forms of deviance. It is not likely for loners to be female, middle class, or middle-aged. Since deviants are usually defensive, they don’t have the support of other deviants, the career of loners is short lived.
John has some male friends that he links them with girls, and they pay him. For every girl, he successful links to his friends and they end up spending the weekend together he is paid $50. To ensure that he is more efficient in his business, John furnishes himself with ideology, equipment, skills, and knowledge which he needs to boost is deviance of acting as a small pimp to his friends ( Holt et al., 2018) . John is a private person and does not want other people to know what he is doing so he does not tell any person of his ventures.
Colleagues
Similar to loners, colleagues operate as individuals. However, colleagues associate with others involved in the similar type of deviance. Colleagues form simple groups which avail crucial service to its members. Colleagues train new members with deviant skills as well as ideologies which justifies their deviance ( Rubington & Weinberg, 2015) . Also, the association offers sociability to its members with whom one's deviant identity requires not be obscured: an actor could bring down his or her guard short of dread of discovery by agents of social control (Best & Luckenbill, 1980).
Moreover, the association offers information on ways to obtain deviance, opportunities, strategies, new techniques, and opportunities. Colleagues learn and are supposed to adhere to lose sets of norms that associates avail to its members. The success of colleagues is measured by the individual performance when operating in solace ( Holt et al., 2018) . Newbies usually sample the scenes and when they find it difficult they quit. Only the colleagues who are more successful prolong their career.
After doing the business for long, John can move up the deviant ladder and join colleagues. He can be offered some training to be more deviant and become a pimp. He can have his prostitutes who clients can contact him to be given to one client in exchange for money (Best & Luckenbill, 1980). John relies on the association with strategies, new techniques, and opportunities to further his business.
Peers
Similar to colleagues, the peer’s associated with each other and befit from services which are provided by their fellow peers. They involve themselves in the socialization of novices, the maintenance of a loose, and considerable sociable interaction ( Holt et al., 2018) . Dissimilar to colleagues, peers engage in deviant acts together and are involved in the deviant transaction at the same time and place. Peers form a network that supplies one another basic goods and services ( Rubington & Weinberg, 2015) . Also, they interact as equals, and there is a minimal division of labour; specialised roles are not common.
To expand his business, John can join other peers who are doing the same business. The reason to join with other pimps is to protect themselves since the business is illegal (Best & Luckenbill, 1980). In peers, John can interact with other peers as equals and get some business ideas which he could inject into his business that will boost it
Mobs
Mobs are small groups of career or professional deviants which are organized to attain particular, profitable goals. The activities of the mob are well coordinated, and the members perform a special role- a complicated division of labor compared to those of peers. Generally, at least one role of the mob is highly skilled requiring training and practice ( Holt et al., 2018) . Mobs have a complicated mob link to outsiders. They practice profitable crime which is safe.
John can join the mob and bring his prostitute. He will be ranked depending on the types of prostitutes he has ( Rubington & Weinberg, 2015) . While in the mob his prostitutes can be given to people with high status in the society for high payment. Some of the money obtained is paid to the prostitute, and the remainder is for John.
Formal Organization
Formal Organization of deviants involves may individual, but, more significantly, the actions are coordinated to accomplish deviant tasks on a daily basis proficiently. Whereas mob function as a group in sequence of episodic attacks, formal organization is characterized by role delegation and through steady and routine levels of productivity ( Holt et al., 2018) . The formal organization operates openly and make huge profits. Members are expected to protect the secrets of the organization.
In this continuum, John can join an organization that has offices that do international prostitution. He will be scouting, and register his prostitutes under his agency, but the company uses his prostitutes for their customers. The payment is made to the agency that John owns, and the agents pay the prostitutes.
References
Best Joel & Luckenbil F. David. (1980). The Social Organization Of Deviants.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.903.8185&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Holt, T. J., Freilich, J. D., Chermak, S. M., Mills, C., & Silva, J. (2018). Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization. American Journal of Criminal Justice , 1-23.
Rubington, E., & Weinberg, M. (2015). Deviance: The interactionist perspective . Routledge.
