The visual qualities of urban design: why are they important and which are the most important. By walking down the street in the process various physical as well as spatial elements consisting of history, culture and urbanity are revealed incrementally, as are its visual qualities: ( Hussein & Armstrong, 2016) in their argument of modernism critiques, they claimed that cause of visual stimulation brings unpredictable complexity in urban structural which can have aesthetic appeal in urban fundamentals. The urban design visual qualities define how space can be used to arouse the visual perception of the viewer. The visual stimulation which captivates the viewer’s eye takes into account the front elevation as well as street edge discontinuities, variety, and contrasts, changing perspectives, focal point, enclosure, and figure-ground perception ( Boyle, 2017) . Visual qualities of urban design that are most important are enclosure, complexity, legibility, transparency, human scale, coherence imageability. In line with the environmental perspective psychology, the gestalt theory, the spatial structure, and street aesthetics and urban spaces are fundamental for visual perception, imageability and legibility, and affect the assessment of the visual of San Luis Obispo.
The visual qualities in urban designing are the most important feature in architectural design ( Hussein & Armstrong, 2016) . Street design has a bearing on the level of comfort along with travel decisions for the pedestrian. Apart from just the mode of transportation, the urban design affects the degree of attractiveness, and eventually, the financial viability of the town area. Possibly the salient component in the public space, the streets have a major role in the creation and hosting the everyday activities of the town.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I ndicate which quality or qualities they represent, and write a short narrative on the elements that are generating it. Illustrate with the photos
Imageability
The visual quality that of a space or a setting that enable visual to identify or distinguish; the distinct feature that makes a place memorable ( Hussein & Armstrong, 2016) .
Enclosure
The extent to which public space or street is defined in its visual aspect for instance buildings, trees, walls as well as other visual components ( Boyle, 2017) . The street below is a good example of a landscape with various visual elements in an enclosed space.
Human Scale
It is the dimension in physical elements articulation, texture, and size, or the proportionality of relative to the walking speed. The building in the image display texture and a way that gives
Transparency
The extent to which viewer can be able to see or the degree of perception of human activity past the outer street limits or other urban spaces.
Complexity
A space that possesses high visual opulence is mainly defined by the type of the physical landscape ( Hussein & Armstrong, 2016) . In the image below there is visual richness as the street contain the various elements which contains the representation of human activities.
The field work generally involves visual assessment of San Luis Obispo’s Downtown Center. SLO has a wider visual space which accommodates visual qualities that make the town appealing even with the town arrangement it makes it easy for pedestrians to walk through ( Boyle, 2017). SLO townscape, its geographical features; has a modern urban design and architecture. The town is quite spacious where all of these qualities blend in a dynamic and engaging scenery where one can walk comfortably. The field work has been a learning point as the SLO forms a landscape which contains visual elements that form a balance, order, and harmony ( Khalaf, 2016) . The San Luis Obispo’s Downtown Center brings on board the perceptive impact for aesthetic comprehension with distinct components which overshadows time as well as cultural impression. The visual perception, in this case, embraces the rhythm appreciation, the sense of rhyme and pattern, balance recognition as well as the impression of harmonic interactions.
References
Boyle, G. (2017). Design project management . Routledge.
Hussein, D., & Armstrong, P. (2016). Building an Arithmetic Model to Assess Visual Consistency in Townscape. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction, and Architectural Engineering , 10 (4), 508-515.
Khalaf, R. W. (2016). Architectural compatibility beyond the eye of the beholder. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development , 6 (3), 238-254.
