Question 1
The definition of enlightenment, according to Kant, is referred to as the emergence of man from a self-imposed immaturity (Hesse, 2018). The idea of immaturity is derived from the capacity to think without being guided by another person. Kant believed that lazy people who are self-indulgent could not be in the position of influencing anything. I supported Kant when he stated that society holds people accountable for anything that they do. The norms and traditions of society make everyone be judged. The moral duty of people is to follow the rules and laws that are made. They also have to learn things individually and be happy. Most p are leaving unfulfilling life because they do not understand life, and when they do not understand themselves, they should expect failure.
Immaturity is referred to as self-inflictions of not lacking understanding but not having the courage to reason and utilizing wisdom and intellects without seeking guidance from anyone else. Using this basis then, immaturity is self-cause and not because of lacking intelligence but not having determinations and courage in using intelligence without being directed by anyone else. Kant stated that people must sufficiently utilize time to teach themselves and not just follow other people's beliefs. The beliefs of an individual can be different from that of another person. I agreed with Kant when he said that people have the moral authority to think of their interests and considering themselves first. When everyone does not think on their own, there will be replications of things. People need to be dependent inters of how they do certain things. However, there are some situations that people dependent on others when they disable, such as when they use alcohol or drugs. These people are not good at making decisions on their own as they need assistance from others. Otherwise, people have to get out and learn things on their own.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Question 2
Socrates’ did not follow the law and was given a death sentence after asking many questions and frequently criticized the justice system. It resulted in the powerful leaders asking him to stop while threatening him; however, Socrates was stubborn and did not stop criticizing the Athens laws. I believe people have the obligation of adhering to the law as people would not survive in a society without law. After stating that, I believe some rules may be unjust, and people have the moral obligations to alter the laws. The only time people should break laws while knowing it is when it goes against human rights. Any law that is passed, people should question it, and when it is unjust, people must take the necessary steps to get rid of that law or change it fully. People must consider one another and not be self-centered and forget about the greater good. Most people ignore questioning injustices when it benefits either in terms of power or wealth (Leibowitz, 2010). People have the moral obligations to follow the law. Most citizens do not want to have court dates and be in trouble with the law, and they are aware that when they do what they are supposed to do, their lives can be easier. Maybe not the way they want it to be but a bit better. In the Bible, there are the Ten Commandments that people must abide by it. Sometimes, people do not follow it. Things like stealing, killing, and adultery are told are wrong. Moreover, there are various other things that people are to follow; however, they constantly break them. In other situations, people have a moral obligation not to follow the law. For example, when a person loses a job and needs to find food for their children, they may go out and steal. They are aware that what they are doing is wrong, but they are in desperate positions. Other people may refuse to work in a company while they know some work needs to be done; however, they stand their ground and fight for what is best for their company.
Question 3
Some of the characteristics of intelligent persons are that they can pass a test, solve complicated mathematic equations, find answers to chemistry questions, and read many books. Some of the characteristics of a wise person include that they do well in real-life situations, but they can fail in theoretical work and cannot answer simple questions. I believe that being intelligent is compared to book smart. I think intelligence is attained from reading books, getting good grades on tests, and getting better grades. The other form of intelligence involves the ability to be born to understand and learn things faster compared to other people (Davison, 2013). Having a quick learning curve or being in an advanced class is among the forms of having intelligence. Contrary wisdom is often attained through life experiences. For instance, I gained wisdom by learning how to cook from my mother, going fishing with my dad, or hunting with my grandfathers. Some people can be intelligent and not wise. At the same time, I know people who can solve complex math problems; however, when faced with real-life situations, they cannot handle them. I believe intelligence is linked it some levels of class and poise or even more refined.
Nonetheless by being wise is brought by working at a place for long times or being a politician. I believe people attain knowledge from real-life situations, and they adapt to it as quickly as possible. The most significant difference between the two is that intelligence tests and book smart while wisdom is real-life smart. A person can be book smart and not be able to find a solution to a problem in real life, while another person can be wise in a situation and save their lives but not take a test and pass it. From the discussion it is evident that both have their benefits and differences.
References
Hesse, C. (2018). The Other Enlightenment . Princeton University Press.
Leibowitz, D. M. (2010). The ironic defence of Socrates: Plato's Apology . Cambridge University Press.
Davison, A. (2013). The Love of Wisdom: An Introduction to Philosophy for Theologians . SCM Press.
