The article discusses whether university or college students should have permission to involve in real qualitative research. The vital issue that forms the foundation of the discussion is the fact that while carrying out a research study, there are ethical issues that a researcher must encounter ( Punch, 1994). Scholars require making ethical decisions to protect research participants. Another question the article discusses is the political dilemma in many areas that are potentially perfect for political research. The discussion shows that some people support the idea of allowing students to participate in real qualitative research while others refute. The supporters offer different reasons, including the experiences the students will get by involving in a practical study rather than sitting in the classroom, making assumptions. On the contrary, opposers claim that students have no research experience. Hence, they may harm the study participants, both politically and ethically, when they have permission to conduct a qualitative research study.
The discussion's critical question is the extent to which students can handle the new research topics that are emerging, such as racism, ethnics, and feminist discourse that links to political and ethical issues in research. These are sensitive topics, and researchers should have high experience in qualitative research to remain politically and ethically neutral to get the best out of the research study. The question is, can the students remain morally and politically neutral while handling sensitive topics. My opinion is although getting the first-hand experience in qualitative research is critical in modeling the students, the learners should not conduct the real study. The students have less experience, both ethically and politically, and they cannot challenge questions regarding the study.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Reference
Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research .
