In the line of duty, every person is faced with a decision that tests the ethical standards of a person or the organization. The ability to engage the ethical and moral standards especially in profit-oriented organizations is highly compromised by the urge to make extra income for such organizations. It is the responsibility of everybody in their line of work to make sure that they make decisions that do not compromise their integrity or that of the organization.
` Scenario # 1: Wholesome Hamburger Company
There is a water shortage in the country and the Wholesome Hamburger Company require water to produce every single product that they supply. The request by the government to every American is to use the scare resource carefully and less than before.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
What is the ethical dilemma or issue?
The ethical dilemma in this case whether the company should continue to use water as before or heed to the government’s request to use less water. The government is not charging extra for water and the company, therefore, will not incur a higher cost by using the same amount of water as before. Using the same amount as before the company will retain its production capacity but it will go against the wish of the government for everybody to spend less of the scarce resource.
What are the alternatives or possible courses of action ? Identify at least 3 alternatives.
The management of the company has alternatives for the next course of action to choose from. Alternative 1, the company can use the same amount of money and ignore the government’s request. Alternative 2, the company can heed to the government request for everybody to use less amount of water so that it is available to everybody. By heading to the request the company may lose some business or close up some of the restaurants. The company can look for another source of water such as a private supplier or dig their own boreholes where they will get enough water to run the organization.
What are your recommendations ? In other words, of the several alternatives you identified, what do you think the company should do?
From the alternatives above I would recommend that the company get a private supplier or get another source such as a borehole for the organization. That way the company will use less of the government provided water and will be able to maintain its operation throughout the 100 restaurants. However, the company will incur a greater cost of operation than before.
What is your rationale for your recommendations? In other words, why do you recommend this course of action?
My recommendation will ensure that the company will respect the government request to use less of the government provided resource. In addition, the organization will still use the same amount of water to maintain its operations but at its own expense. It will help the organization retain its production in all 100 restaurants. The company can also provide water to society if it will be able to dig its boreholes. It is the responsibility of the management to ensure that it develops a good business environment with the society and the government.
Scenario # 2: Chicken International Group
Chicken international Group supply conventional chicken that is now allowed to roam outside. Chicken international Group wants to increase his income and the marketing manager proposes that they should label the chicken as “free range.”
What is the ethical dilemma or issue?
The ethical dilemma in this scenario is whether or not to label our chicken “Free Range.” By labeling the chicken “free range” we will be able to increase the price of the chicken by 20% and it will increase the profit levels. However, we will be lying to the customers because we will be using unethical means where we only let the hen out of the cage for just 5 minutes and not all chicken are able to get out for those five minutes. The ethical dilemma is that the company want to increase its income at the cost of its integrity.
What are the alternatives or possible courses of action ? Identify at least 3 alternatives?
From the two alternatives at hand, the organization has other possible courses of action to address the problem. Alternative one, the company can open a new firm that produces genuine free-range chicken to target the consumers who observe ethical omnivorism. Ethical omnivorism in chicken consumption means that the customers are loyal to the way the birds have reared either free-range or the caged chicken. Alternative two is to change the whole firm into a free range which means that they will be doing an ethical thing by advertising the firm as free range. Alternative three not to engage in unethical behaviors of lying to the consumers and not to label the company as “Free range.”
What are your recommendations ? In other words, of the several alternatives you identified, what do you think the company should do?
I would recommend that the firm set a branch of the organization that deals with the production of free range chicken. The company has a responsibility to the consumers and society as a whole to ensure that they maintain integrity in all their operations. It is therefore important not to lie or trick the consumers for them to be able to charge high prices for products that are not genuine. It would be unethical to rob the consumers.
What is your rationale for your recommendations? In other words, why do you recommend this course of action?
The rationale for the recommendation is that the firm will eliminate the temptation of lying to their consumers. By setting a branch that will only focus on producing free-range chicken will help the company in eliminating the temptation of using unethical methods to increase the prices of the chicken by lying. It will have another branch and source of income that is also genuine and it will attract the customers who eat chicken from free range. It will, therefore, target a niche market and avoid the problem of being dishonest to the consumers.
