Currently, in the world many people are conscious about what they eat, the current trends show that many people are eating healthy foods that have a high protein content, foods that contain low fats and those that have the recommended number of vitamins and nutrients. Food biotechnology has been facing a lot of opposition from the existing consumer groups and the anti-biotechnology activist groups. The widespread concern that leads to this objection is the fact about the consumer safety (Friedman, 1970). There is a general perception that has been created which presents the foods that contain GMO as harmful, and it is believed that these foods are not adequately tested to prove that there are no toxins or allergens that may cause adverse effects on the lives of the people who consume them. However, according to research and studies that have been conducted over the past has shown that the GMOs have many benefits and helpful in many regions throughout the world. Even with this, there has not been enough or sufficient information that has been presented to show that the foods that contain the GMOs are safe for use. Researchers and other professionals involved in the research have not presented enough information to ensure that the general civic is well informed about the foods with the GMOs. The available data is technical, and most people do not understand it well. The GMOs are more beneficial, and they have more beneficial effects than the harmful effects.Through the GMOs, there has been a significant reduction of poverty rates, especially in the tropical countries. The food security in many countries of the developing world is not assured, this is mostly attributed to the fact that the population of these countries is growing at an alarming rate and many individuals live under the poverty line. This means that even though the food might be available, many people lack the resources that are necessary to purchase it. Many of these nations produce food products and end up exporting them to countries in the developed world, because of these many people in these countries remain in a difficult situation trying to get the food for their consumption. Although there have been efforts that have been directed to ensure that food is made sufficient to these people, a lot has not been achieved yet as many people in these countries still do not have resources to get the food or access to the food (Klümper & Qaim, 2014). The GMO food biotechnology has been as the ultimate solution that has the potential of increasing food security in such countries. Practicing GMO farming by people in such nations helps them to realize great harvest is assuring them of food security; it also helps in fighting poverty as the product can be used to provide earnings. If the GMOs farming is embraced in such countries, there is a high likelihood that the poverty rate will reduce and the food security will also be assured. The GMOs ensure that the food that is produced is safe and that it does not contain contaminants such as pesticides and pathogens. The production, processing, and distribution of food are a crucial service that ensures that there are food security and safe food for the global population. This is because the food is used to nourish the body and provide that people lead a healthy life. There are many aspects of the GMOs food production that are often overlooked and not considered in the debate about the safety of the GMOs (Rettner, 2015). In the processed foods, microbial products are increasingly becoming a standard ingredient. The microbial products are used in the food processing industry to ensure that food safety is maintained. Many foods that are produced through the GMO procedure are tested, and assurance is given that there are no pathogens in the foods. Some experts and professionals ensure that these foods are safe for consumption before they are released to the consumers. Experiments have been conducted to ensure that foods with GMOs are safe for human use. Before the foods are planted or produced, efforts are also directed towards providing that the foods do not contain pathogens that may cause the consumers adverse effects. The process of substantial equivalence is used in ensuring that the safety of the processed foods is assured. The use of GMOs will reduce the dependency of the producers on the chemical fertilizers. In most cases, the farmers and food producers rely so much on chemical fertilizers so that they can be able to yield pamper harvests and also high-quality harvests. Using the GMOs as agricultural inputs will help the producers to achieve the same benefits without depending on the chemical fertilizers and also using fewer labor inputs (Gilbert, 2013). The GM foods are genetically engineered in such a way that the crops can produce the foods that have the required traits and qualities without having to put much effort into producing them. The foods are also produced using the safe production methods which ensure that the consumers of these do not suffer any adverse effects. Relying on chemical fertilizers to produce foods will lead to the production of foods that have high chemical contents that might affect the quality of life of the people consuming the foods. The use of chemical fertilizers is aimed at ensuring that the foods achieve the desired traits. Using genetic engineering will reduce the use of the chemical fertilizers. The geneticists can remove desirable qualities from a particular plant and insert into another plant which will help it achieve the required trait.
The GMOs have the ability and the potential that is needed to solve many problems that are related to food security and safety throughout the world. The practice of GMO farming will provide the assurance of food security in some regions that are faced with the problem of food insecurity. This training is also essential in ensuring that the food that is produced is safe and clean for consumption. The conventional farming methods in most cases rely on chemicals so that they can achieve the required harvest, the chemical used in the production of these foods might have adverse effects on the health of the individuals that consume them. The practice of GMO farming reduces the dependency of these chemicals in agriculture; the use of genetic engineering ensures that the foods that are produced have the required traits without the use of chemical fertilizers. Enough food will be provided using this method of farming and also safe food will be delivered. This shows that the use of GMO is safe and it has more benefits as compared to harmful effects on the consumers.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Ethical Concerns of Generic Food
There are various ethical worries over genetically modified (GM) nourishment, and these have all influenced open help of the items. The issues have additionally activated discussion and controls around GM food and any organization that delivers these yields or items. Concerns go from the earth to dangers to our sustenance web or issues concerning infection, hypersensitivities, and pollution.
Sensitivities and Disease
A critical ethical worry about GM food is their capability to trigger hypersensitivities or illness in people. Given that quality could be separated from an allergenic creature and put into another that regularly does not cause hypersensitivities, a man may unwittingly be presented to an allergen. Thus, this could prompt a hypersensitive response. There is likewise the dread that new hypersensitivities could happen from the blending of qualities from two creatures.
Illness is noteworthy wellbeing stress concerning GM sustenance. Given that a portion of the yields modified is done as such with DNA from a bacterium or infection, there is worry that another ailment may happen in people who expend the GM sustenance. With some GM crops having anti-microbial safe marker qualities, there is likewise the stress that these qualities could be passed on to organisms that reason infection and medical issues in people. With across the board anti-microbial protection as of now as of now happening, any new security could demonstrate heart-breakingly.
Harm to the Environment
Harm to the earth is another ethical dread concerning GM crops. Lamentably, the innovation is still sufficiently new that there is much we don't think about the impact of GM edit generation on nature. Long haul ponders take a long time to finish and most investigations of GM trim generation include here and now has implications for the innovation.
Another ethical issue around GM crops is our capacity to contain them in a particular zone. There are fears that if these harvests do adversely affect the earth, they will spread in a crazy design and we won't have the capacity to stop their harming impacts. For example, one kind of sugar beet that had been designed to be impervious to a particular herbicide wound up inadvertently having the qualities to oppose the other herbicide. At the point when ranchers went to dispose of the yield, despite everything they found that a little rate had survived.
Dangers and Controversies Surrounding the Use of GMOs
In spite of the way that the qualities being moved usually happen in different species, there are obscure results to adjusting the universal condition of a life form through remote quality articulation. Such modifications can change the life form's digestion, development rate, or potentially reaction to external ecological variables. These results impact the GMO itself, as well as the regular habitat in which that living being is permitted to multiply. Potential wellbeing dangers to people incorporate the likelihood of introduction to new allergens in genetically modified nourishments, and the exchange of safe anti-microbial qualities to gut verdure.
Even quality exchange of pesticide, herbicide, or anti-toxin protection from different life forms would put people in danger, as well as cause environmental irregular characteristics, enabling already harmless plants to develop uncontrolled, along these lines advancing the spread of illness among the two plants and creatures. Despite the fact that the likelihood of low-quality exchange amongst GMOs and different living beings can't be denied, as a general rule, this hazard is thought to be very low. The low-quality exchange usually happens at a low rate and, by and large, can't be re-enacted in an advanced research facility condition without dynamic change of the objective genome to build weakness (Ma et al., 2003).
Conversely, the uncertain outcomes of vertical quality exchange amongst GMOs and their wild-type partners have been featured by considering transgenic angle discharged into wild populaces of similar species (Muir and Howard, 1999). The upgraded mating point of interest of the genetically modified fish prompted a decrease in the suitability of their posterity. Therefore, when another transgenic is brought into a wild fish populace, it spreads and may, in the end, undermine the appropriateness of both the wild-type and the genetically modified living beings.
References:
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. New York Times Magazine . Retrieved from http://highered.mcgraw hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073524697/910345/Appendices.pdf
Gilbert, N. (2013, May 2). Case studies: A hard look at GM crops (Links to an external site). Links to an external site . Nature, 497 (7447), 24-26. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/case-studies-a-hard-look-at-gm-crops 1.12907http://www.nature.com/news/case-studies-a-hard-look-at-gm-crops-1.12907
Klümper, W., &Qaim, M. (2014, November 3). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site . PLoS ONE, 9 (11), 17. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article ? id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
Rettner, R. (2015, August 19). New GMO controversy: Are the herbicides dangerous? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Retrieved fromhttp://www.livescience.com/51917-GMO-herbicides-health.html
