It is imperative to have professionals in the field of science and technologies govern an area that entails the two scopes. Arguably, the application of science and technology by human beings contributes to the greatest challenge and possible threat to the sustainability of the world (Zetter, 2016). Therefore, an analysis of the matter remains vital considering that such applications come from the complex economic, social and political contexts getting intertwined by both science and technology in their implementation. According to Paulos (2012), among the 435 members of the House, one is a physicist, one a chemist, one a microbiologist, six engineers and approximately two dozen with medical backgrounds. It further remains crucial that senators and congresspersons be well-verses in the field of science and technology especially when tied to fields that deal with same as it is difficult to lead an area when one has an inclination to another field.
The placing of all spheres of science and technology in a common place of governance in America would do well to significantly influence the rise of America in both science and technology (Zetter, 2016). The senator or congressperson would further scientific and technological issues to greater heights as they would understand the issues and their importance. It is thus right for Americans to ensure the people elected to serve as the leaders of the nation have proper background knowledge to their assigned field of leadership and in this cases, science and technology.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Legal positivism is one of the legislations that has had a wrong foundation on the basis of science and technology. It focusses entirely on social facts as compared to merit seeing that lawyers head the scientific and technological fields (Scoccia, 2007). The following proves very wrong for a nation like America and ensures that the country progresses slowly in matters pertaining to governance of sectors that highly deal with both science and technology.
References
Paulos, J. (2012). Why Don’t Americans Elect Scientists?. The New York Times, p. 1. Retrieved from https://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/why-dont-americans-elect-scientists/
Scoccia, D. (2007). LEGAL POSITIVISM vs. NATURAL LAW THEORY (1st ed.). Mac OS X 10.4.2 Quartz PDFContext. Retrieved from http://web.nmsu.edu/~dscoccia/376web/376lpaust.pdf
Zetter, K. (2016). Of Course Congress Is Clueless About Tech—It Killed Its Tutor. Wired, 1. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/04/office-technology-assessment-congress-clueless-tech-killed-tutor/
